Message ID | 20200629003218.794639-2-samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | hurd: More cancelation point work | expand |
On Jun 29 2020, Samuel Thibault wrote: > (void) __mach_msg (NULL, MACH_RCV_MSG|MACH_RCV_TIMEOUT|MACH_RCV_INTERRUPT, > - 0, 0, recv, (useconds + 999) / 1000, MACH_PORT_NULL); > + 0, 0, recv, useconds_up / 1000, MACH_PORT_NULL); Perhaps it should be written as useconds / 1000 + (useconds % 1000 != 0). Andreas.
Andreas Schwab, le lun. 29 juin 2020 09:58:12 +0200, a ecrit: > On Jun 29 2020, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > (void) __mach_msg (NULL, MACH_RCV_MSG|MACH_RCV_TIMEOUT|MACH_RCV_INTERRUPT, > > - 0, 0, recv, (useconds + 999) / 1000, MACH_PORT_NULL); > > + 0, 0, recv, useconds_up / 1000, MACH_PORT_NULL); > > Perhaps it should be written as useconds / 1000 + (useconds % 1000 != > 0). Right, that's less hardcoding indeed :) Samuel
diff --git a/sysdeps/mach/usleep.c b/sysdeps/mach/usleep.c index 530336ba0b..d53eb04a51 100644 --- a/sysdeps/mach/usleep.c +++ b/sysdeps/mach/usleep.c @@ -25,11 +25,15 @@ int usleep (useconds_t useconds) { mach_port_t recv; + useconds_t useconds_up = useconds + 999; + + if (useconds_up < useconds) + useconds_up = UINT32_MAX; recv = __mach_reply_port (); (void) __mach_msg (NULL, MACH_RCV_MSG|MACH_RCV_TIMEOUT|MACH_RCV_INTERRUPT, - 0, 0, recv, (useconds + 999) / 1000, MACH_PORT_NULL); + 0, 0, recv, useconds_up / 1000, MACH_PORT_NULL); __mach_port_destroy (mach_task_self (), recv); return 0;