From patchwork Fri Jun 26 11:51:30 2015 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Stefan Liebler X-Patchwork-Id: 488756 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 686D3140271 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 21:52:12 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.b=H7VpNNoc; dkim-atps=neutral DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references; q=dns; s=default; b=jI/h70d6/CofFTMFd/3V/xo3Bnux8Y6 yGhMXhahLmJNC9VtnaV7RooQmdVchUvfsNaY80NXBwKsz+K1Yhuoj8x5KxVGm4fd 8iAqWZTY32GPvzlxf7p01nJA/ZiFPhPfFwbkKJBe51tm08wCdUCxIlHLVvTQsUOJ +8QOiSmpDL4s= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references; s=default; bh=XxdL1rmigI6+4fQc5h9N/u4iSVA=; b=H7VpN Nocmr6EU+ScZtvEXQ38Dq50s35TkSZgKWCexBqxaTAL7hDYQ5TfIQ/p5gDPyVLDl bTlICzOoLN0n0T8JdYih7ZDDLgb47/xc+fclP9Lfjw1UJlUSGEVlixHXlBikP4Pz Db84pyX0otnq7VqGpNSPjXRkqlIub/lCnLJ1/8= Received: (qmail 20355 invoked by alias); 26 Jun 2015 11:52:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Delivered-To: mailing list libc-alpha@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 20326 invoked by uid 89); 26 Jun 2015 11:52:04 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com X-MailFrom: stli@linux.vnet.ibm.com X-RcptTo: libc-alpha@sourceware.org From: Stefan Liebler To: libc-alpha@sourceware.org Cc: Stefan Liebler Subject: [PATCH 05/27] S390: configure check for vector instruction support in assembler. Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 13:51:30 +0200 Message-Id: <1435319512-22245-6-git-send-email-stli@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <1435319512-22245-1-git-send-email-stli@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1435319512-22245-1-git-send-email-stli@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 15062611-0017-0000-0000-00000489969B The S390 specific test checks if the assembler has support for the new z13 vector instructions by compiling a vector instruction. The .machine and .machinemode directives are needed to compile the vector instruction without -march=z13 option on 31/64 bit. On success the macro HAVE_S390_VX_ASM_SUPPORT is defined. This macro is used to determine if the optimized functions can be build without compile errors. If the used assembler lacks vector support, then a warning is dumped while configuring and only the common code functions are build. The z13 instruction support was introduced in "[Committed] S/390: Add support for IBM z13." (https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2015-01/msg00197.html) ChangeLog: * config.h.in (HAVE_S390_VX_ASM_SUPPORT): New macro undefine. * sysdeps/s390/configure.ac: Add test for S390 vector instruction assembler support. * sysdeps/s390/configure: Regenerated. --- config.h.in | 3 +++ sysdeps/s390/configure | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ sysdeps/s390/configure.ac | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 71 insertions(+) diff --git a/config.h.in b/config.h.in index 2b9aa1a..8d44b8a 100644 --- a/config.h.in +++ b/config.h.in @@ -91,6 +91,9 @@ /* Define if assembler supports AVX512. */ #undef HAVE_AVX512_ASM_SUPPORT +/* Define if assembler supports vector instructions on S390. */ +#undef HAVE_S390_VX_ASM_SUPPORT + /* Define if assembler supports Intel MPX. */ #undef HAVE_MPX_SUPPORT diff --git a/sysdeps/s390/configure b/sysdeps/s390/configure index be6397e..1748752 100644 --- a/sysdeps/s390/configure +++ b/sysdeps/s390/configure @@ -104,5 +104,45 @@ if test "$enable_lock_elision" = yes && test "$libc_cv_gcc_builtin_tbegin" = no critic_missing="$critic_missing The used GCC has no support for __builtin_tbegin, which is needed for lock-elision on target S390." fi + +{ $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: checking for S390 vector instruction support" >&5 +$as_echo_n "checking for S390 vector instruction support... " >&6; } +if ${libc_cv_asm_s390_vx+:} false; then : + $as_echo_n "(cached) " >&6 +else + cat > conftest.c <<\EOF +void testvecinsn () +{ + __asm__ (".machine \"z13\" \n\t" + ".machinemode \"zarch_nohighgprs\" \n\t" + "vistrbs %%v16,%%v17" : :); +} +EOF +if { ac_try='${CC-cc} --shared conftest.c -o conftest.o &> /dev/null' + { { eval echo "\"\$as_me\":${as_lineno-$LINENO}: \"$ac_try\""; } >&5 + (eval $ac_try) 2>&5 + ac_status=$? + $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: \$? = $ac_status" >&5 + test $ac_status = 0; }; } ; +then + libc_cv_asm_s390_vx=yes +else + libc_cv_asm_s390_vx=no +fi +rm -f conftest* +fi +{ $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: result: $libc_cv_asm_s390_vx" >&5 +$as_echo "$libc_cv_asm_s390_vx" >&6; } + +if test "$libc_cv_asm_s390_vx" = yes ; +then + $as_echo "#define HAVE_S390_VX_ASM_SUPPORT 1" >>confdefs.h + +else + { $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: WARNING: Use binutils with vector-support in order to use optimized implementations." >&5 +$as_echo "$as_me: WARNING: Use binutils with vector-support in order to use optimized implementations." >&2;} +fi + + test -n "$critic_missing" && as_fn_error $? " *** $critic_missing" "$LINENO" 5 diff --git a/sysdeps/s390/configure.ac b/sysdeps/s390/configure.ac index 493e9a4..ab5294f 100644 --- a/sysdeps/s390/configure.ac +++ b/sysdeps/s390/configure.ac @@ -36,5 +36,33 @@ if test "$enable_lock_elision" = yes && test "$libc_cv_gcc_builtin_tbegin" = no critic_missing="$critic_missing The used GCC has no support for __builtin_tbegin, which is needed for lock-elision on target S390." fi + +AC_CACHE_CHECK(for S390 vector instruction support, libc_cv_asm_s390_vx, [dnl +cat > conftest.c <<\EOF +void testvecinsn () +{ + __asm__ (".machine \"z13\" \n\t" + ".machinemode \"zarch_nohighgprs\" \n\t" + "vistrbs %%v16,%%v17" : :); +} +EOF +dnl +dnl test, if assembler supports S390 vector instructions +if AC_TRY_COMMAND([${CC-cc} --shared conftest.c -o conftest.o &> /dev/null]) ; +then + libc_cv_asm_s390_vx=yes +else + libc_cv_asm_s390_vx=no +fi +rm -f conftest* ]) + +if test "$libc_cv_asm_s390_vx" = yes ; +then + AC_DEFINE(HAVE_S390_VX_ASM_SUPPORT) +else + AC_MSG_WARN([Use binutils with vector-support in order to use optimized implementations.]) +fi + + test -n "$critic_missing" && AC_MSG_ERROR([ *** $critic_missing])