| Message ID | cover.1603909005.git.szabolcs.nagy@arm.com |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | aarch64: Fix variant PCS support [BZ #26978] | expand |
The 10/29/2020 08:39, Szabolcs Nagy via Libc-alpha wrote: > My original implementation for variant PCS support has a bug > that makes it ineffective. > > I plan to backport this fix to the release branches after some > testing, the test case is separate because it requires configure > changes to check binutils support and thus harder to backport. these patches are committed to master now. commit 558251bd8785760ad40fcbfeaaee5d27fa5b0fe4 commit e156dabc766d6f6f99ce9402999eae380a3ec1f2 > > Szabolcs Nagy (2): > aarch64: Fix DT_AARCH64_VARIANT_PCS handling [BZ #26798] > aarch64: Add variant PCS lazy binding test [BZ #26798] > > sysdeps/aarch64/Makefile | 7 ++ > sysdeps/aarch64/configure | 40 ++++++++++ > sysdeps/aarch64/configure.ac | 22 +++++ > sysdeps/aarch64/dl-machine.h | 12 +-- > sysdeps/aarch64/tst-vpcs-mod.S | 141 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > sysdeps/aarch64/tst-vpcs.c | 78 ++++++++++++++++++ > 6 files changed, 292 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 sysdeps/aarch64/tst-vpcs-mod.S > create mode 100644 sysdeps/aarch64/tst-vpcs.c > > -- > 2.17.1 >
* Szabolcs Nagy via Libc-alpha: > The 10/29/2020 08:39, Szabolcs Nagy via Libc-alpha wrote: >> My original implementation for variant PCS support has a bug >> that makes it ineffective. >> >> I plan to backport this fix to the release branches after some >> testing, the test case is separate because it requires configure >> changes to check binutils support and thus harder to backport. > > these patches are committed to master now. > > commit 558251bd8785760ad40fcbfeaaee5d27fa5b0fe4 > commit e156dabc766d6f6f99ce9402999eae380a3ec1f2 Do you plan to backport them to recent stable branches? Thanks, Florian
The 11/02/2020 13:35, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Szabolcs Nagy via Libc-alpha: > > > The 10/29/2020 08:39, Szabolcs Nagy via Libc-alpha wrote: > >> My original implementation for variant PCS support has a bug > >> that makes it ineffective. > >> > >> I plan to backport this fix to the release branches after some > >> testing, the test case is separate because it requires configure > >> changes to check binutils support and thus harder to backport. > > > > these patches are committed to master now. > > > > commit 558251bd8785760ad40fcbfeaaee5d27fa5b0fe4 > > commit e156dabc766d6f6f99ce9402999eae380a3ec1f2 > > Do you plan to backport them to recent stable branches? yes, i will wait two days and then backport these to release branches that have broken vpcs support.