From patchwork Fri Jul 29 09:31:53 2011 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Rainer Orth X-Patchwork-Id: 107360 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4B388B6F69 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 19:32:16 +1000 (EST) Received: (qmail 27535 invoked by alias); 29 Jul 2011 09:32:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 27527 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Jul 2011 09:32:14 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from snape.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (HELO smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE) (129.70.160.84) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 09:31:57 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (Postfix) with ESMTP id E92B3688 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 11:31:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (malfoy.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id azZG5-lF5OQp for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 11:31:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [129.70.161.120]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61228687 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 11:31:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from ro@localhost) by manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (8.14.5+Sun/8.14.5/Submit) id p6T9VsOe008261; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 11:31:54 +0200 (MEST) From: Rainer Orth To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [testsuite] XFAIL gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr42585.c on Tru64 UNIX (PR tree-optimization/47407) Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 11:31:53 +0200 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (usg-unix-v) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org As Martin analyzed in the PR, those failures are expected, so I'm XFAILing them. Tested with the appropriate runtest invocations on alpha-dec-osf5.1b and i386-pc-solaris2.11, installed on mainline. Rainer 2011-07-29 Rainer Orth PR tree-optimization/47407 * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr42585.c: XFAIL scan-tree-dump-times on alpha*-dec-osf*. Sort target list. Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr42585.c =================================================================== --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr42585.c (revision 176918) +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr42585.c (working copy) @@ -35,6 +35,6 @@ /* Whether the structs are totally scalarized or not depends on the MOVE_RATIO macro defintion in the back end. The scalarization will not take place when using small values for MOVE_RATIO. */ -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "struct _fat_ptr _ans" 0 "optimized" { target { ! "powerpc*-*-* arm-*-* sh*-*-* s390*-*-*" } } } } */ -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "struct _fat_ptr _T2" 0 "optimized" { target { ! "powerpc*-*-* arm-*-* sh*-*-* s390*-*-*" } } } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "struct _fat_ptr _ans" 0 "optimized" { target { ! "alpha*-dec-osf* arm-*-* powerpc*-*-* s390*-*-* sh*-*-*" } } } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "struct _fat_ptr _T2" 0 "optimized" { target { ! "alpha*-dec-osf* arm-*-* powerpc*-*-* s390*-*-* sh*-*-*" } } } } */ /* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "optimized" } } */