diff mbox

[testsuite] XFAIL gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr42585.c on Tru64 UNIX (PR tree-optimization/47407)

Message ID yddlivha0vq.fsf@manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Rainer Orth July 29, 2011, 9:31 a.m. UTC 
As Martin analyzed in the PR, those failures are expected, so I'm
XFAILing them.

Tested with the appropriate runtest invocations on alpha-dec-osf5.1b and
i386-pc-solaris2.11, installed on mainline.

	Rainer


2011-07-29  Rainer Orth  <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>

	PR tree-optimization/47407
	* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr42585.c: XFAIL scan-tree-dump-times on
	alpha*-dec-osf*.
	Sort target list.
diff mbox

Patch

Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr42585.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr42585.c	(revision 176918)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr42585.c	(working copy)
@@ -35,6 +35,6 @@ 
 /* Whether the structs are totally scalarized or not depends on the
    MOVE_RATIO macro defintion in the back end.  The scalarization will
    not take place when using small values for MOVE_RATIO.  */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "struct _fat_ptr _ans" 0 "optimized" { target { ! "powerpc*-*-* arm-*-* sh*-*-* s390*-*-*" } } } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "struct _fat_ptr _T2" 0 "optimized" { target { ! "powerpc*-*-* arm-*-* sh*-*-* s390*-*-*" } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "struct _fat_ptr _ans" 0 "optimized" { target { ! "alpha*-dec-osf* arm-*-* powerpc*-*-* s390*-*-* sh*-*-*" } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "struct _fat_ptr _T2" 0 "optimized" { target { ! "alpha*-dec-osf* arm-*-* powerpc*-*-* s390*-*-* sh*-*-*" } } } } */
 /* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "optimized" } } */