diff mbox series

compare_tests: distinguish c-c++-common results by tool

Message ID or8r5p2xmp.fsf@lxoliva.fsfla.org
State New
Headers show
Series compare_tests: distinguish c-c++-common results by tool | expand

Commit Message

Alexandre Oliva Dec. 20, 2023, 6:31 a.m. UTC
On Dec 20, 2023, Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com> wrote:

> So the strub tests in c-c++-common are problematical.  They get run
> twice, once for C, once for C++.  Yet the name of the test is the same 
> in both runs. (by the name, I mean the name emitted into the dejagnu
> summary and log files).

> Thus if you have a test in there which passes in one context, but
> fails in the other, comparison tools like contrib/compare_tests may 
> erroneously report the tests as both a test which now fails, but
> passed before and a test which now passes but failed before.

> It looks like some of the strub tests are currently known to fail with
> C++ and are triggering this problem

Yeah, type warnings/errors are different between C and C++, and this is
noticeable with permissible conversions between strub types.


> A third option would be to change the compare_tests tool to somehow
> distinguish between the C and C++ tests.  Not sure how feasible that
> is.

Most feasible among the possibilities ;-)

I've tested the following by comparing my obj-x86_64-linux-gnu test tree
with itself.  Ok to install?


When compare_tests compares both C and C++ tests in c-c++-common, they
get the same identifier, so expected differences in results across
languages become undesirably noisy.

This patch adds tool identifiers to tests, so that runs by different
tools are not confused by the compare logic.

It also fixes a bug in reporting differences, that would attempt to
print an undefined fname (the definitions are in subshell loops), and
adjusts the target insertion to match tabs in addition to blanks after
colons.


for  contrib/ChangeLog

	* compare_tests: Add tool to test lines.  Match tabs besides
	blanks to insert tool and target.  Don't print undefined fname.
---
 contrib/compare_tests |    6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Jeff Law Dec. 20, 2023, 5:17 p.m. UTC | #1
On 12/19/23 23:31, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Dec 20, 2023, Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> So the strub tests in c-c++-common are problematical.  They get run
>> twice, once for C, once for C++.  Yet the name of the test is the same
>> in both runs. (by the name, I mean the name emitted into the dejagnu
>> summary and log files).
> 
>> Thus if you have a test in there which passes in one context, but
>> fails in the other, comparison tools like contrib/compare_tests may
>> erroneously report the tests as both a test which now fails, but
>> passed before and a test which now passes but failed before.
> 
>> It looks like some of the strub tests are currently known to fail with
>> C++ and are triggering this problem
> 
> Yeah, type warnings/errors are different between C and C++, and this is
> noticeable with permissible conversions between strub types.
> 
> 
>> A third option would be to change the compare_tests tool to somehow
>> distinguish between the C and C++ tests.  Not sure how feasible that
>> is.
> 
> Most feasible among the possibilities ;-)
> 
> I've tested the following by comparing my obj-x86_64-linux-gnu test tree
> with itself.  Ok to install?
> 
> 
> When compare_tests compares both C and C++ tests in c-c++-common, they
> get the same identifier, so expected differences in results across
> languages become undesirably noisy.
> 
> This patch adds tool identifiers to tests, so that runs by different
> tools are not confused by the compare logic.
> 
> It also fixes a bug in reporting differences, that would attempt to
> print an undefined fname (the definitions are in subshell loops), and
> adjusts the target insertion to match tabs in addition to blanks after
> colons.
> 
> 
> for  contrib/ChangeLog
> 
> 	* compare_tests: Add tool to test lines.  Match tabs besides
> 	blanks to insert tool and target.  Don't print undefined fname
Go for it.  It's hard to know if there'll be fallout in the consumers, 
but I think if there is pain, it should be short term.

Jeff
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/contrib/compare_tests b/contrib/compare_tests
index 2dfa8640756a0..e09fc4f113a3f 100755
--- a/contrib/compare_tests
+++ b/contrib/compare_tests
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@  if [ -d "$1" -a -d "$2" ] ; then
 	ret=$?
 	if [ $ret -ne 0 ]; then
 		exit_status=`expr $exit_status + 1`
-		echo "## Differences found: $fname"
+		echo "## Differences found"
 	fi
 	if [ $exit_status -ne 0 ]; then
 		echo "# $exit_status differences in $cmnsums common sum files found"
@@ -108,8 +108,8 @@  elif [ -d "$1" -o -d "$2" ] ; then
 	usage "Must specify either two directories or two files"
 fi
 
-sed 's/^XFAIL/FAIL/; s/^ERROR/FAIL/; s/^XPASS/PASS/' < "$1" | awk '/^Running target / {target = $3} { if (target != "unix") { sub(/: /, "&"target": " ); }; print $0; }' | cut -c1-2000 >$tmp1
-sed 's/^XFAIL/FAIL/; s/^ERROR/FAIL/; s/^XPASS/PASS/' < "$2" | awk '/^Running target / {target = $3} { if (target != "unix") { sub(/: /, "&"target": " ); }; print $0; }' | cut -c1-2000 >$tmp2
+sed 's/^XFAIL/FAIL/; s/^ERROR/FAIL/; s/^XPASS/PASS/' < "$1" | awk '/^[	 ]*=== [^ ]* tests ===$/ {tool = $2} /^Running target / {target = $3} { if (tool != "") { sub(/:[ 	]/, "&"tool": " ); }; if (target != "unix") { sub(/:[ 	]/, "&"target": " ); }; print $0; }' | cut -c1-2000 >$tmp1
+sed 's/^XFAIL/FAIL/; s/^ERROR/FAIL/; s/^XPASS/PASS/' < "$2" | awk '/^[	 ]*=== [^ ]* tests ===$/ {tool = $2} /^Running target / {target = $3} { if (tool != "") { sub(/:[ 	]/, "&"tool": " ); }; if (target != "unix") { sub(/:[ 	]/, "&"target": " ); }; print $0; }' | cut -c1-2000 >$tmp2
 
 before=$tmp1
 now=$tmp2