@@ -276,6 +276,10 @@ (define_predicate "reg_or_int_operand"
(ior (match_operand 0 "register_operand")
(match_operand 0 "const_int_operand")))
+(define_predicate "vector_const_0_operand"
+ (and (match_code "const_vector")
+ (match_test "satisfies_constraint_Wc0 (op)")))
+
(define_predicate "vector_move_operand"
(ior (match_operand 0 "nonimmediate_operand")
(and (match_code "const_vector")
@@ -1217,23 +1217,24 @@ (define_expand "@pred_broadcast<mode>"
(match_operand:V 2 "vector_merge_operand")))]
"TARGET_VECTOR"
{
- /* Handle vmv.s.x instruction which has memory scalar. */
- if (satisfies_constraint_Wdm (operands[3]) || riscv_vector::simm5_p (operands[3])
- || rtx_equal_p (operands[3], CONST0_RTX (<VEL>mode)))
+ /* Handle vmv.s.x instruction (Wb1 mask) which has memory scalar. */
+ if (satisfies_constraint_Wdm (operands[3]))
{
if (satisfies_constraint_Wb1 (operands[1]))
- {
- // Case 1: vmv.s.x (TA) ==> vlse.v (TA)
- if (satisfies_constraint_vu (operands[2]))
- operands[1] = CONSTM1_RTX (<VM>mode);
- else if (GET_MODE_BITSIZE (<VEL>mode) > GET_MODE_BITSIZE (Pmode))
- {
- // Case 2: vmv.s.x (TU) ==> andi vl + vlse.v (TU) in RV32 system.
+ {
+ /* Case 1: vmv.s.x (TA, x == memory) ==> vlse.v (TA) */
+ if (satisfies_constraint_vu (operands[2]))
+ operands[1] = CONSTM1_RTX (<VM>mode);
+ else if (GET_MODE_BITSIZE (<VEL>mode) > GET_MODE_BITSIZE (Pmode))
+ {
+ /* Case 2: vmv.s.x (TU, x == memory) ==>
+ vl = 0 or 1; + vlse.v (TU) in RV32 system */
operands[4] = riscv_vector::gen_avl_for_scalar_move (operands[4]);
operands[1] = CONSTM1_RTX (<VM>mode);
}
- else
- operands[3] = force_reg (<VEL>mode, operands[3]);
+ else
+ /* Case 3: load x (memory) to register. */
+ operands[3] = force_reg (<VEL>mode, operands[3]);
}
}
else if (GET_MODE_BITSIZE (<VEL>mode) > GET_MODE_BITSIZE (Pmode)
@@ -1348,6 +1349,24 @@ (define_insn "*pred_broadcast<mode>_extended_scalar"
[(set_attr "type" "vimov,vimov,vimovxv,vimovxv")
(set_attr "mode" "<MODE>")])
+(define_insn "*pred_broadcast<mode>_zero"
+ [(set (match_operand:V 0 "register_operand" "=vr, vr")
+ (if_then_else:V
+ (unspec:<VM>
+ [(match_operand:<VM> 1 "vector_least_significant_set_mask_operand" "Wb1, Wb1")
+ (match_operand 4 "vector_length_operand" " rK, rK")
+ (match_operand 5 "const_int_operand" " i, i")
+ (match_operand 6 "const_int_operand" " i, i")
+ (match_operand 7 "const_int_operand" " i, i")
+ (reg:SI VL_REGNUM)
+ (reg:SI VTYPE_REGNUM)] UNSPEC_VPREDICATE)
+ (match_operand:V 3 "vector_const_0_operand" "Wc0, Wc0")
+ (match_operand:V 2 "vector_merge_operand" " vu, 0")))]
+ "TARGET_VECTOR"
+ "vmv.s.x\t%0,zero"
+ [(set_attr "type" "vimovxv,vimovxv")
+ (set_attr "mode" "<MODE>")])
+
;; -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
;; ---- Predicated Strided loads/stores
;; -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ void foo8 (void *base, void *out, size_t vl, double x)
/*
** foo9:
** ...
-** vmv.v.i\tv[0-9]+,\s*-15
+** vmv.s.x\tv[0-9]+,\s*[a-x0-9]+
** ...
** ret
*/
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ void foo10 (void *base, void *out, size_t vl)
/*
** foo11:
** ...
-** vmv.v.i\tv[0-9]+,\s*0
+** vmv.s.x\tv[0-9]+,\s*zero
** ...
** ret
*/
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ void foo11 (void *base, void *out, size_t vl)
/*
** foo12:
** ...
-** vfmv.s.f\tv[0-9]+,\s*[a-x0-9]+
+** vmv.s.x\tv[0-9]+,\s*zero
** ...
** ret
*/
@@ -174,3 +174,17 @@ void foo12 (void *base, void *out, size_t vl)
vfloat64m2_t v = __riscv_vfmv_s_f_f64m2_tu (merge, 0, vl);
*(vfloat64m2_t*)out = v;
}
+
+/*
+** foo13:
+** ...
+** vfmv.s.f\tv[0-9]+,\s*[a-x0-9]+
+** ...
+** ret
+*/
+void foo13 (void *base, void *out, size_t vl)
+{
+ vfloat64m2_t merge = *(vfloat64m2_t*) (base + 200);
+ vfloat64m2_t v = __riscv_vfmv_s_f_f64m2_tu (merge, 0.2, vl);
+ *(vfloat64m2_t*)out = v;
+}
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ void foo8 (void *base, void *out, size_t vl, double x)
/*
** foo9:
** ...
-** vmv.v.i\tv[0-9]+,\s*-15
+** vmv.s.x\tv[0-9]+,\s*[a-x0-9]+
** ...
** ret
*/
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ void foo9 (void *base, void *out, size_t vl)
/*
** foo10:
** ...
-** vmv.v.i\tv[0-9]+,\s*-15
+** vmv.s.x\tv[0-9]+,\s*[a-x0-9]+
** ...
*/
void foo10 (void *base, void *out, size_t vl)
@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ void foo10 (void *base, void *out, size_t vl)
/*
** foo11:
** ...
-** vmv.v.i\tv[0-9]+,\s*0
+** vmv.s.x\tv[0-9]+,\s*zero
** ...
** ret
*/
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ void foo11 (void *base, void *out, size_t vl)
/*
** foo12:
** ...
-** vmv.v.i\tv[0-9]+,\s*0
+** vmv.s.x\tv[0-9]+,\s*zero
** ...
** ret
*/
@@ -172,6 +172,20 @@ void foo12 (void *base, void *out, size_t vl)
*(vfloat64m2_t*)out = v;
}
+/*
+** foo12_1:
+** ...
+** vfmv.s.f\tv[0-9]+,\s*[a-x0-9]+
+** ...
+** ret
+*/
+void foo12_1 (void *base, void *out, size_t vl)
+{
+ vfloat64m2_t merge = *(vfloat64m2_t*) (base + 200);
+ vfloat64m2_t v = __riscv_vfmv_s_f_f64m2_tu (merge, 0.2, vl);
+ *(vfloat64m2_t*)out = v;
+}
+
/*
** foo13:
** ...
This backport is the first of two required for the pr111935 testcase, already backported to gcc-13, to pass on riscv64-elf and riscv32-elf. The V_VLS mode iterator, used in the original patch, is not available in gcc-13, and I thought that would be too much to backport (and maybe so are these two patches, WDYT?), so I changed it to V, to match the preexisting gcc-13 pattern. Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu, along with other backports, and tested manually on riscv64-elf. Ok to install? From: Lehua Ding <lehua.ding@rivai.ai> Hi, This patch revert the convert from vmv.s.x to vmv.v.i and add new pattern optimize the special case when the scalar operand is zero. Currently, the broadcast pattern where the scalar operand is a imm will be converted to vmv.v.i from vmv.s.x and the mask operand will be converted from 00..01 to 11..11. There are some advantages and disadvantages before and after the conversion after discussing with Juzhe offline and we chose not to do this transform. Before: Advantages: The vsetvli info required by vmv.s.x has better compatibility since vmv.s.x only required SEW and VLEN be zero or one. That mean there is more opportunities to combine with other vsetlv infos in vsetvl pass. Disadvantages: For non-zero scalar imm, one more `li rd, imm` instruction will be needed. After: Advantages: No need `li rd, imm` instruction since vmv.v.i support imm operand. Disadvantages: Like before's advantages. Worse compatibility leads to more vsetvl instrunctions need. Consider the bellow C code and asm after autovec. there is an extra insn (vsetivli zero, 1, e32, m1, ta, ma) after converted vmv.s.x to vmv.v.i. ``` int foo1(int* restrict a, int* restrict b, int *restrict c, int n) { int sum = 0; for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) sum += a[i] * b[i]; return sum; } ``` asm (Before): ``` foo1: ble a3,zero,.L7 vsetvli a2,zero,e32,m1,ta,ma vmv.v.i v1,0 .L6: vsetvli a5,a3,e32,m1,tu,ma slli a4,a5,2 sub a3,a3,a5 vle32.v v2,0(a0) vle32.v v3,0(a1) add a0,a0,a4 add a1,a1,a4 vmacc.vv v1,v3,v2 bne a3,zero,.L6 vsetvli a2,zero,e32,m1,ta,ma vmv.s.x v2,zero vredsum.vs v1,v1,v2 vmv.x.s a0,v1 ret .L7: li a0,0 ret ``` asm (After): ``` foo1: ble a3,zero,.L4 vsetvli a2,zero,e32,m1,ta,ma vmv.v.i v1,0 .L3: vsetvli a5,a3,e32,m1,tu,ma slli a4,a5,2 sub a3,a3,a5 vle32.v v2,0(a0) vle32.v v3,0(a1) add a0,a0,a4 add a1,a1,a4 vmacc.vv v1,v3,v2 bne a3,zero,.L3 vsetivli zero,1,e32,m1,ta,ma vmv.v.i v2,0 vsetvli a2,zero,e32,m1,ta,ma vredsum.vs v1,v1,v2 vmv.x.s a0,v1 ret .L4: li a0,0 ret ``` Best, Lehua Co-Authored-By: Ju-Zhe Zhong <juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai> gcc/ChangeLog: * config/riscv/predicates.md (vector_const_0_operand): New. * config/riscv/vector.md (*pred_broadcast<mode>_zero): Ditto. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/scalar_move-5.c: Update. * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/scalar_move-6.c: Ditto. (cherry picked from commit 86d80395cf3c8832b669135b1ca7ea8258790c19) --- gcc/config/riscv/predicates.md | 4 ++ gcc/config/riscv/vector.md | 43 ++++++++++++++------ .../gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/scalar_move-5.c | 20 ++++++++- .../gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/scalar_move-6.c | 22 ++++++++-- 4 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)