From patchwork Wed Jun 22 06:01:43 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Alexandre Oliva X-Patchwork-Id: 1646342 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gcc.gnu.org header.i=@gcc.gnu.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=yw9qtlC1; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=gcc.gnu.org (client-ip=2620:52:3:1:0:246e:9693:128c; helo=sourceware.org; envelope-from=gcc-patches-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org; receiver=) Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [IPv6:2620:52:3:1:0:246e:9693:128c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4LSXpd4L4wz9s5V for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 16:02:15 +1000 (AEST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28E9C3835697 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 06:02:13 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 28E9C3835697 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1655877733; bh=795z4Xl5tKqDeosvyUw6XCjCtqYy515TqfkFlFLRAIs=; h=To:Subject:Date:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post: List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:From; b=yw9qtlC1sT35U/yyUra4V+ifDrBQiukM6h7VLEiG0l+byZZhNgRt+dryiHpYa6KiD 5E9cPbDg54rsgj36cbkoz/WwBivRIgPukZ9QPFvEIWHiD7ll8FxhQZArRo34I3a49w Y3IuvLAKW3mPfQDRxjsW2GDq1suT0iTA7c45lvKw= X-Original-To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (rock.gnat.com [IPv6:2620:20:4000:0:a9e:1ff:fe9b:1d1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BE65386C585; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 06:01:53 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 6BE65386C585 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3528F1160FA; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 02:01:53 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id lqHpn2I7AAYa; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 02:01:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from free.home (tron.gnat.com [IPv6:2620:20:4000:0:46a8:42ff:fe0e:e294]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F37901160F1; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 02:01:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from livre (livre.home [172.31.160.2]) by free.home (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 25M61hfR723397 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 22 Jun 2022 03:01:44 -0300 To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [PATCH] libstdc++: 60241.cc: tolerate slightly shorter aggregate sleep Organization: Free thinker, does not speak for AdaCore Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 03:01:43 -0300 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, GIT_PATCH_0, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Patchwork-Original-From: Alexandre Oliva via Gcc-patches From: Alexandre Oliva Reply-To: Alexandre Oliva Errors-To: gcc-patches-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org Sender: "Gcc-patches" On rtems under qemu, the frequently-interrupted nanosleep ends up sleeping shorter than expected, by a margin of less than 0,3%. I figured failing the library test over a system (emulator?) bug is undesirable, so I put in some tolerance for the drift. Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu, also tested with a cross to aarch64-rtems6. Ok to install? PS: I see nothing wrong with the implementation of clock_nanosleep (used by nanosleep) on rtems6 that could cause it to wake up too early. I suspect some artifact of the emulation environment. for libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog * testsuite/30_threads/this_thread/60421.cc: Tolerate a slightly early wakeup. --- .../testsuite/30_threads/this_thread/60421.cc | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/30_threads/this_thread/60421.cc b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/30_threads/this_thread/60421.cc index 12dbeba1cc492..f3a5af453c4ad 100644 --- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/30_threads/this_thread/60421.cc +++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/30_threads/this_thread/60421.cc @@ -51,9 +51,10 @@ test02() std::thread t([&result, &sleeping] { auto start = std::chrono::system_clock::now(); auto time = std::chrono::seconds(3); + auto tolerance = std::chrono::milliseconds(10); sleeping = true; std::this_thread::sleep_for(time); - result = std::chrono::system_clock::now() >= (start + time); + result = std::chrono::system_clock::now() + tolerance >= (start + time); sleeping = false; }); while (!sleeping)