From patchwork Thu Mar 23 16:02:52 2017 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Thomas Preudhomme X-Patchwork-Id: 742715 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3vprtq0tjvz9s3w for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 03:03:14 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gcc.gnu.org header.i=@gcc.gnu.org header.b="LcotBKc/"; dkim-atps=neutral DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-archive:list-post:list-help:sender:to :from:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=W9hGiom7egveHUAM0gWXxY96v3jh6ALcfqv2L2i7kqEtAhPv34 h6xeeO5U8Yltzz8fjrP0La2A5b3qTkv/kL9Y5+iwSNgrfFI+paGsUFQlsL+2+0Oj tNCrm5LCUWgyc4oSgeSxpWH28Wx0S7/Z3MG1CkZ2kwv3Dl7rAnh9c5w7g= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-archive:list-post:list-help:sender:to :from:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:content-type; s= default; bh=DxISIYMfJ6bVmecCp8D3tCTnX8o=; b=LcotBKc/nOzAqb54LXfT hL7t/Ipw+MfgdE82e2KskKmsS6M3U5bY0RghGPYQ7FaQgmO0HReZb7M9nC1wxMDy xsFuDRob8KfWCGJu3yc2s798oD4PcGKmydvTM8aSDRuvJTwDSsZEPKHTYKZ+ROH9 q7Jpx6hy76+Q46b9gKtuUx0= Received: (qmail 23097 invoked by alias); 23 Mar 2017 16:03:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23033 invoked by uid 89); 23 Mar 2017 16:03:01 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-25.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, GIT_PATCH_0, GIT_PATCH_1, GIT_PATCH_2, GIT_PATCH_3, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: foss.arm.com Received: from foss.arm.com (HELO foss.arm.com) (217.140.101.70) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 16:02:55 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEC3F2B; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 09:02:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.2.206.52] (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 28C1D3F23B; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 09:02:54 -0700 (PDT) To: Kyrill Tkachov , Ramana Radhakrishnan , Richard Earnshaw , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" From: Thomas Preudhomme Subject: [PATCH, GCC/testsuite/ARM, stage4] Compile atomic_loaddi_11 for Cortex-R5 Message-ID: Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 16:02:52 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-IsSubscribed: yes Hi, gcc.target/arm/atomic_loaddi_11.c testcase contributed in r246365 does not test the changed code since ARMv7-R does not have division instructions in ARM state. This patch changes it to target Cortex-R5 processor instead which does have division instructions in ARM state. ChangeLog entry is as follows: *** gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog *** 2017-03-22 Thomas Preud'homme