Message ID | ZtleKk2gKgh7TECt@tucnak |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | vrp: Fix up diagnostics wording | expand |
Ok On Thu, Sep 5, 2024, 09:30 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi! > > I've noticed non-standard wording of this diagnostics when looking at > a miscompilation with --param=vrp-block-limit=0. > > Diagnostics generally shouldn't start with uppercase letter (unless > the upper case would appear also in the middle of a sentence) and shouldn't > be separate sentences with dot as separator, ; is IMHO more frequently > used. > > Ok for trunk? > > 2024-09-05 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> > > * tree-vrp.cc (pass_vrp::execute): Start diagnostics with > lowercase u rather than capital U, use semicolon instead of dot. > > --- gcc/tree-vrp.cc.jj 2024-07-01 11:28:23.489227914 +0200 > +++ gcc/tree-vrp.cc 2024-09-04 21:26:35.693634896 +0200 > @@ -1337,7 +1337,7 @@ public: > { > use_fvrp = true; > warning (OPT_Wdisabled_optimization, > - "Using fast VRP algorithm. %d basic blocks" > + "using fast VRP algorithm; %d basic blocks" > " exceeds %<--param=vrp-block-limit=%d%> limit", > n_basic_blocks_for_fn (fun), > param_vrp_block_limit); > > Jakub > >
--- gcc/tree-vrp.cc.jj 2024-07-01 11:28:23.489227914 +0200 +++ gcc/tree-vrp.cc 2024-09-04 21:26:35.693634896 +0200 @@ -1337,7 +1337,7 @@ public: { use_fvrp = true; warning (OPT_Wdisabled_optimization, - "Using fast VRP algorithm. %d basic blocks" + "using fast VRP algorithm; %d basic blocks" " exceeds %<--param=vrp-block-limit=%d%> limit", n_basic_blocks_for_fn (fun), param_vrp_block_limit);