@@ -213,6 +213,6 @@ compute_on_bytes (uint8_t *in_data, int
expected, so this case is restricted to lp64 only so far. This different
ivopts choice affects riscv64 as well, probably because it also lacks
base+index addressing modes, so the ip[len] address computation can't be
- made from the IV computation above. powerpc64le similarly is affected. */
+ made from the IV computation above. powerpc64{,le} similarly is affected. */
- /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Sunk statements: 5" 1 "sink2" { target lp64 xfail { riscv64-*-* powerpc64le-*-* hppa*64*-*-* } } } } */
+ /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Sunk statements: 5" 1 "sink2" { target lp64 xfail { riscv64-*-* powerpc64*-*-* hppa*64*-*-* } } } } */