Message ID | CA+=Sn1k+nNLFtN9oGO_zot=cLNJ7vjaLOpTzojqDK+CDzR9ziw@mail.gmail.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012, Andrew Pinski wrote: > Woops, I had missed that. Here is the patch which adds both octeon+ > and octeon2 to that list. > > I committed as obvious after a build. You may want to update the release notes as well (htdocs/gcc-4.7/changes.html). Gerald
Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> writes: > On Wed, 4 Jan 2012, Andrew Pinski wrote: >> Woops, I had missed that. Here is the patch which adds both octeon+ >> and octeon2 to that list. >> >> I committed as obvious after a build. > > You may want to update the release notes as well > (htdocs/gcc-4.7/changes.html). FWIW, I'm planning to do a sweep of MIPS changes in time for 4.7. (I prefer to write them all at once, although I realise there are good arguments for doing them as soon as the patch goes in.) Richard
Index: doc/invoke.texi =================================================================== --- doc/invoke.texi (revision 182884) +++ doc/invoke.texi (working copy) @@ -14812,7 +14812,7 @@ The processor names are: @samp{1004kc}, @samp{1004kf2_1}, @samp{1004kf1_1}, @samp{loongson2e}, @samp{loongson2f}, @samp{loongson3a}, @samp{m4k}, -@samp{octeon}, +@samp{octeon}, @samp{octeon+}, @samp{octeon2}, @samp{orion}, @samp{r2000}, @samp{r3000}, @samp{r3900}, @samp{r4000}, @samp{r4400}, @samp{r4600}, @samp{r4650}, @samp{r6000}, @samp{r8000},