From patchwork Sun Feb 27 18:13:53 2011 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "H.J. Lu" X-Patchwork-Id: 84698 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E2C18B7105 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 05:14:03 +1100 (EST) Received: (qmail 22452 invoked by alias); 27 Feb 2011 18:14:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 22437 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Feb 2011 18:14:01 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-iw0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-iw0-f175.google.com) (209.85.214.175) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 18:13:54 +0000 Received: by iwn10 with SMTP id 10so2642061iwn.20 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 10:13:53 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.165.137 with SMTP id k9mr3894962icy.424.1298830433330; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 10:13:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.60.129 with HTTP; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 10:13:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4D694C37.6040205@net-b.de> <20110226192034.GY30899@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> <4D69569B.2070204@net-b.de> Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 10:13:53 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [OpenMP, Patch] PR fortran/47886 fix ICE in OMP task's if() clause From: "H.J. Lu" To: Tobias Burnus Cc: Jakub Jelinek , gcc patches , gfortran X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 10:12 AM, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Tobias Burnus wrote: >> Jakub Jelinek wrote: >>>> >>>> Build and regtested on x86-64-linux. >>>> OK for the trunk? What about GCC 4.4 and 4.5? >>> >>> Oh, forgot about that, can you please add a testcase for this? >>> If you don't get to it, I'll do it on Monday. >> >> Thanks for the reminder! I even regtested with a test case - but I forget to >> include it in the patch ... >> >> Committed attached patch as Rev. 170521. I will backport after regtesting >> the branches. >> >> Tobias >> > > I checked in this patch into 4.4 branch. I also checked this into 4.5 branch. H.J. Index: ChangeLog =================================================================== --- ChangeLog (revision 170544) +++ ChangeLog (working copy) @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -2011-01-27 Tobias Burnus +2011-02-27 Tobias Burnus Backport from mainline 2011-02-27 Jakub Jelinek