===================================================================
@@ -1079,7 +1079,7 @@ comptypes_internal (const_tree type1, co
return 1;
/* 1 if no need for warning yet, 2 if warning cause has been seen. */
- if (!(attrval = targetm.comp_type_attributes (t1, t2)))
+ if (!(attrval = comp_type_attributes (t1, t2)))
return 0;
/* 1 if no need for warning yet, 2 if warning cause has been seen. */
===================================================================
@@ -1012,8 +1012,8 @@ decls_match (tree newdecl, tree olddecl)
types_match =
compparms (p1, p2)
&& (TYPE_ATTRIBUTES (TREE_TYPE (newdecl)) == NULL_TREE
- || targetm.comp_type_attributes (TREE_TYPE (newdecl),
- TREE_TYPE (olddecl)) != 0);
+ || comp_type_attributes (TREE_TYPE (newdecl),
+ TREE_TYPE (olddecl)) != 0);
}
else
types_match = 0;
===================================================================
@@ -1897,7 +1897,7 @@ check_final_overrider (tree overrider, t
}
/* Check for conflicting type attributes. */
- if (!targetm.comp_type_attributes (over_type, base_type))
+ if (!comp_type_attributes (over_type, base_type))
{
error ("conflicting type attributes specified for %q+#D", overrider);
error (" overriding %q+#D", basefn);
===================================================================
@@ -1338,7 +1338,7 @@ structural_comptypes (tree t1, tree t2,
/* If we get here, we know that from a target independent POV the
types are the same. Make sure the target attributes are also
the same. */
- return targetm.comp_type_attributes (t1, t2);
+ return comp_type_attributes (t1, t2);
}
/* Return true if T1 and T2 are related as allowed by STRICT. STRICT
===================================================================
@@ -3615,7 +3615,7 @@ gimple_types_compatible_p_1 (tree t1, tr
state, sccstack, sccstate, sccstate_obstack))
goto different_types;
- if (!targetm.comp_type_attributes (t1, t2))
+ if (!comp_type_attributes (t1, t2))
goto different_types;
if (TYPE_ARG_TYPES (t1) == TYPE_ARG_TYPES (t2))
===================================================================
@@ -1438,7 +1438,7 @@ useless_type_conversion_p (tree outer_ty
/* Defer to the target if necessary. */
if (TYPE_ATTRIBUTES (inner_type) || TYPE_ATTRIBUTES (outer_type))
- return targetm.comp_type_attributes (outer_type, inner_type) != 0;
+ return comp_type_attributes (outer_type, inner_type) != 0;
return true;
}
===================================================================
@@ -4283,7 +4283,7 @@ build_type_attribute_qual_variant (tree
its canonical type, we will need to use structural equality
checks for this type. */
if (TYPE_STRUCTURAL_EQUALITY_P (ttype)
- || !targetm.comp_type_attributes (ntype, ttype))
+ || !comp_type_attributes (ntype, ttype))
SET_TYPE_STRUCTURAL_EQUALITY (ntype);
else if (TYPE_CANONICAL (ntype) == ntype)
TYPE_CANONICAL (ntype) = TYPE_CANONICAL (ttype);
@@ -4296,6 +4296,67 @@ build_type_attribute_qual_variant (tree
return ttype;
}
+/* Return 0 if the attributes for two types are incompatible, 1 if they
+ are compatible, and 2 if they are nearly compatible (which causes a
+ warning to be generated). */
+int
+comp_type_attributes (const_tree type1, const_tree type2)
+{
+ const_tree a1 = TYPE_ATTRIBUTES (type1);
+ const_tree a2 = TYPE_ATTRIBUTES (type2);
+ const_tree a;
+
+ if (a1 == a2)
+ return 1;
+ for (a = a1; a != NULL_TREE; a = TREE_CHAIN (a))
+ {
+ const struct attribute_spec *as;
+ const_tree attr;
+
+ as = lookup_attribute_spec (TREE_PURPOSE (a));
+ if (!as || as->affects_type_identity == false)
+ continue;
+
+ attr = lookup_attribute (as->name, CONST_CAST_TREE (a2));
+ if (!attr)
+ break;
+
+ if (TREE_VALUE (a) != NULL_TREE
+ && TREE_CODE (TREE_VALUE (a)) == TREE_LIST
+ && TREE_VALUE (attr) != NULL
+ && TREE_CODE (TREE_VALUE (attr)) == TREE_LIST)
+ {
+ if (simple_cst_list_equal (TREE_VALUE (a),
+ TREE_VALUE (attr)) == 1)
+ break;
+ }
+ else if (simple_cst_equal (TREE_VALUE (a), TREE_VALUE (attr)) == 1)
+ break;
+ }
+ if (!a)
+ {
+ for (a = a2; a != NULL_TREE; a = TREE_CHAIN (a))
+ {
+ const struct attribute_spec *as;
+
+ as = lookup_attribute_spec (TREE_PURPOSE (a));
+ if (!as || as->affects_type_identity == false)
+ continue;
+
+ if (!lookup_attribute (as->name, CONST_CAST_TREE (a1)))
+ break;
+ /* We don't need to compare trees again, as we did this
+ already in first loop. */
+ }
+ /* All types - affecting identity - are equal, so
+ there is no need to call target hook for comparison. */
+ if (!a)
+ return 1;
+ }
+ /* As some type combinations - like default calling-convention - might
+ be compatible, we have to call the target hook to get the final result. */
+ return targetm.comp_type_attributes (type1, type2);
+}
/* Return a type like TTYPE except that its TYPE_ATTRIBUTE
is ATTRIBUTE.
===================================================================
@@ -4286,6 +4286,11 @@ extern tree build_type_attribute_variant
extern tree build_decl_attribute_variant (tree, tree);
extern tree build_type_attribute_qual_variant (tree, tree, int);
+/* Return 0 if the attributes for two types are incompatible, 1 if they
+ are compatible, and 2 if they are nearly compatible (which causes a
+ warning to be generated). */
+extern int comp_type_attributes (const_tree, const_tree);
+
/* Structure describing an attribute and a function to handle it. */
struct attribute_spec
{