From patchwork Mon Oct 5 12:22:40 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Tom de Vries X-Patchwork-Id: 1376758 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=gcc.gnu.org (client-ip=8.43.85.97; helo=sourceware.org; envelope-from=gcc-patches-bounces@gcc.gnu.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.de Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C4fr96bSdz9sSn for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 23:22:47 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72F9738708BF; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 12:22:44 +0000 (GMT) X-Original-To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D209B3857802 for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 12:22:41 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org D209B3857802 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.de Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=tdevries@suse.de X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A40F7AF39; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 12:22:40 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [committed][omp, ftracer] Remove incorrect suggestion in ignore_bb_p To: Alexander Monakov References: <515e156e-c917-fcd9-7402-4feb991e894c@suse.de> From: Tom de Vries Autocrypt: addr=tdevries@suse.de; keydata= xsBNBF0ltCcBCADDhsUnMMdEXiHFfqJdXeRvgqSEUxLCy/pHek88ALuFnPTICTwkf4g7uSR7 HvOFUoUyu8oP5mNb4VZHy3Xy8KRZGaQuaOHNhZAT1xaVo6kxjswUi3vYgGJhFMiLuIHdApoc u5f7UbV+egYVxmkvVLSqsVD4pUgHeSoAcIlm3blZ1sDKviJCwaHxDQkVmSsGXImaAU+ViJ5l CwkvyiiIifWD2SoOuFexZyZ7RUddLosgsO0npVUYbl6dEMq2a5ijGF6/rBs1m3nAoIgpXk6P TCKlSWVW6OCneTaKM5C387972qREtiArTakRQIpvDJuiR2soGfdeJ6igGA1FZjU+IsM5ABEB AAHNH1RvbSBkZSBWcmllcyA8dGRldnJpZXNAc3VzZS5kZT7CwKsEEwEIAD4WIQSsnSe5hKbL MK1mGmjuhV2rbOJEoAUCXSW0JwIbAwUJA8JnAAULCQgHAgYVCgkICwIEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAAh CRDuhV2rbOJEoBYhBKydJ7mEpsswrWYaaO6FXats4kSgc48H/Ra2lq5p3dHsrlQLqM7N68Fo eRDf3PMevXyMlrCYDGLVncQwMw3O/AkousktXKQ42DPJh65zoXB22yUt8m0g12xkLax98KFJ 5NyUloa6HflLl+wQL/uZjIdNUQaHQLw3HKwRMVi4l0/Jh/TygYG1Dtm8I4o708JS4y8GQxoQ UL0z1OM9hyM3gI2WVTTyprsBHy2EjMOu/2Xpod95pF8f90zBLajy6qXEnxlcsqreMaqmkzKn 3KTZpWRxNAS/IH3FbGQ+3RpWkNGSJpwfEMVCeyK5a1n7yt1podd1ajY5mA1jcaUmGppqx827 8TqyteNe1B/pbiUt2L/WhnTgW1NC1QDOwE0EXSW0JwEIAM99H34Bu4MKM7HDJVt864MXbx7B 1M93wVlpJ7Uq+XDFD0A0hIal028j+h6jA6bhzWto4RUfDl/9mn1StngNVFovvwtfzbamp6+W pKHZm9X5YvlIwCx131kTxCNDcF+/adRW4n8CU3pZWYmNVqhMUiPLxElA6QhXTtVBh1RkjCZQ Kmbd1szvcOfaD8s+tJABJzNZsmO2hVuFwkDrRN8Jgrh92a+yHQPd9+RybW2l7sJv26nkUH5Z 5s84P6894ebgimcprJdAkjJTgprl1nhgvptU5M9Uv85Pferoh2groQEAtRPlCGrZ2/2qVNe9 XJfSYbiyedvApWcJs5DOByTaKkcAEQEAAcLAkwQYAQgAJhYhBKydJ7mEpsswrWYaaO6FXats 4kSgBQJdJbQnAhsMBQkDwmcAACEJEO6FXats4kSgFiEErJ0nuYSmyzCtZhpo7oVdq2ziRKD3 twf7BAQBZ8TqR812zKAD7biOnWIJ0McV72PFBxmLIHp24UVe0ZogtYMxSWKLg3csh0yLVwc7 H3vldzJ9AoK3Qxp0Q6K/rDOeUy3HMqewQGcqrsRRh0NXDIQk5CgSrZslPe47qIbe3O7ik/MC q31FNIAQJPmKXX25B115MMzkSKlv4udfx7KdyxHrTSkwWZArLQiEZj5KG4cCKhIoMygPTA3U yGaIvI/BGOtHZ7bEBVUCFDFfOWJ26IOCoPnSVUvKPEOH9dv+sNy7jyBsP5QxeTqwxC/1ZtNS DUCSFQjqA6bEGwM22dP8OUY6SC94x1G81A9/xbtm9LQxKm0EiDH8KBMLfQ== Message-ID: <9cee5add-8b5e-833a-9417-b326d0c6897e@suse.de> Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 14:22:40 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, GIT_PATCH_0, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Jakub Jelinek , Tobias Burnus , Richard Biener , gcc-patches Errors-To: gcc-patches-bounces@gcc.gnu.org Sender: "Gcc-patches" [ was: Re: [PATCH][omp, ftracer] Don't duplicate blocks in SIMT region ] On 10/5/20 10:51 AM, Alexander Monakov wrote: >> + The IFN_GOMP_SIMT_VOTE_ANY is currently part of such a group, >> + so the same holds there, but it could be argued that the >> + IFN_GOMP_SIMT_VOTE_ANY could be generated after that group, >> + in which case it could be duplicated. */ > No, something like that cannot be argued, as VOTE_ANY may have data > dependencies to storage that is deallocated by SIMT_EXIT. You seem to be > claiming something that is simply not possible with the current design. > Fixed in patch below, committed. Thanks, - Tom [omp, ftracer] Remove incorrect suggestion in ignore_bb_p In commit ab3f4b27abe "[omp, ftracer] Don't duplicate blocks in SIMT region" I added a comment in ignore_bb_p suggesting a reordering of SIMT_VOTE_ANY and SIMT_EXIT, which is not possible since VOTE_ANY may have data dependencies to storage that is deallocated by SIMT_EXIT. I've now opened a PR (PR97291) to describe the problem the reordering was intended to fix. Remove the incorrect suggestion. gcc/ChangeLog: 2020-10-05 Tom de Vries * tracer.c (ignore_bb_p): Remove incorrect suggestion. --- gcc/tracer.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/tracer.c b/gcc/tracer.c index 5e51752d89f..5ee66511f8d 100644 --- a/gcc/tracer.c +++ b/gcc/tracer.c @@ -115,10 +115,8 @@ ignore_bb_p (const_basic_block bb) /* An IFN_GOMP_SIMT_ENTER_ALLOC/IFN_GOMP_SIMT_EXIT call must be duplicated as part of its group, or not at all. - The IFN_GOMP_SIMT_VOTE_ANY is currently part of such a group, - so the same holds there, but it could be argued that the - IFN_GOMP_SIMT_VOTE_ANY could be generated after that group, - in which case it could be duplicated. */ + The IFN_GOMP_SIMT_VOTE_ANY is part of such a group, so the same holds + there. */ if (is_gimple_call (g) && (gimple_call_internal_p (g, IFN_GOMP_SIMT_ENTER_ALLOC) || gimple_call_internal_p (g, IFN_GOMP_SIMT_EXIT)