Message ID | 93D76812-17DC-4085-A1A2-FBF851B5E31D@comcast.net |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On 11/12/2015 12:46 PM, Mike Stump wrote: > My port needs the below patch. I think this was reduced by someone on a port that didn’t use some features (TARGET_SHORT_BRANCH_CHEAPER) of tm.h. > > So, the question is, is this the preferred way to do this? I don’t want to hookize TARGET_SHORT_BRANCH_CHEAPER, which is the other fix. > > If yes, Ok? I'd prefer not. We will likely run the reducers regularly and each time someone is going to look at this and have to remember that it's dealing with a need that is specific to an out-of-tree port. I'd recommend hookizing. Jeff
diff --git a/gcc/bb-reorder.c b/gcc/bb-reorder.c index 3dcb82a..7a2b351 100644 --- a/gcc/bb-reorder.c +++ b/gcc/bb-reorder.c @@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ #include "bb-reorder.h" #include "except.h" #include "fibonacci_heap.h" +#include "tm_p.h" /* The number of rounds. In most cases there will only be 4 rounds, but when partitioning hot and cold basic blocks into separate sections of