@@ -2774,9 +2774,9 @@ gfc_trans_omp_clauses (stmtblock_t *block, gfc_omp_clauses *clauses,
}
else
{
- OMP_CLAUSE_DECL (node) = decl;
+ OMP_CLAUSE_DECL (node) = inner;
OMP_CLAUSE_SIZE (node)
- = TYPE_SIZE_UNIT (TREE_TYPE (decl));
+ = TYPE_SIZE_UNIT (TREE_TYPE (inner));
}
}
else if (lastcomp->next
new file mode 100644
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+! { dg-additional-options "-fdump-tree-gimple" }
+
+subroutine foo
+ type one
+ integer i, j
+ end type
+ type two
+ type(one) A, B
+ end type
+
+ type(two) x
+
+ !$acc enter data copyin(x%A)
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "omp target oacc_enter_exit_data map\\(struct:x \\\[len: 1\\\]\\) map\\(to:x.a \\\[len: \[0-9\]+\\\]\\)" 1 "gimple" } }
+end
new file mode 100644
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+subroutine foo
+ type one
+ integer i, j
+ end type
+ type two
+ type(one) A, B
+ end type
+
+ type(two) x
+
+! This is accepted at present, although it represents a probably-unintentional
+! overlapping subcopy.
+ !$acc enter data copyin(x%A, x%A%i)
+! But this raises an error.
+ !$acc enter data copyin(x%A, x%A%i, x%A%i)
+! { dg-error ".x.a.i. appears more than once in map clauses" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
+end