From patchwork Mon Mar 5 21:23:08 2012 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jason Merrill X-Patchwork-Id: 144774 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 04A7CB6F98 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 08:23:28 +1100 (EST) Comment: DKIM? See http://www.dkim.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; x=1331587409; h=Comment: DomainKey-Signature:Received:Received:Received:Received:Received: Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject: Content-Type:Mailing-List:Precedence:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:Sender:Delivered-To; bh=6a1y38C /pjoSh5d/p0sIijTqwBE=; b=lqrUhWm3cBLHJ62yeva3hqYypynp0Tyre11eO7g JEqslV+PPQTuuc/NnWud4f9S19kFb56cpVNr9xYN0YvkUAOA1oxad7E8Za4BthQg 4COUs44Vhe6hYYJNiIyypfLkBJ00S62euGBhfOV6kqkM+V8tj7DGS4nHQ6AvvtAj qdH4= Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=Received:Received:X-SWARE-Spam-Status:X-Spam-Check-By:Received:Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:Content-Type:Mailing-List:Precedence:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:Sender:Delivered-To; b=M5lx2RTJMiQAeHoqlufUpQO7JQele4OwmdnQXftwM5Mx93HAcyLPy4XrqRg5Ds hG+eLJBwTvg+ubv3wKshh0FQIRKc8+jOIIkWwJcwzG5EhTq0aCjXmAYx+xxn7Qzr 4BQZSS+q/EAYImJdwU1MiTD0FNy6pyDvqyIr80hTVKWRc=; Received: (qmail 25426 invoked by alias); 5 Mar 2012 21:23:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 25418 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Mar 2012 21:23:24 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_PASS, TW_XG, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 21:23:10 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q25LN9tO032365 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 5 Mar 2012 16:23:09 -0500 Received: from [10.3.113.56] (ovpn-113-56.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.56]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q25LN81A015422; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 16:23:08 -0500 Message-ID: <4F552EBC.2060302@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 16:23:08 -0500 From: Jason Merrill User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eric Botcazou CC: gcc-patches List Subject: PATCH to ada/gcc-interface/Make-lang.in to fix build issues Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Rebuilding gcc was failing for me because the rule for gnat_ugn.texi was trying to use xgnatugn before it had been built. Fixed by making it directly, like the rule for projects.texi. OK for trunk? commit 2ad07fd7f293027ed3f779fc0d7e79b58a4b7e2a Author: Jason Merrill Date: Mon Mar 5 16:05:23 2012 -0500 * gcc-interface/Make-lang.in (doc/gnat_ugn.texi): Build xgnatugn before using it. diff --git a/gcc/ada/gcc-interface/Make-lang.in b/gcc/ada/gcc-interface/Make-lang.in index 06a8803..8a2f346 100644 --- a/gcc/ada/gcc-interface/Make-lang.in +++ b/gcc/ada/gcc-interface/Make-lang.in @@ -667,6 +667,7 @@ ada/doctools/xgnatugn$(build_exeext): ada/xgnatugn.adb doc/gnat_ugn.texi: $(srcdir)/ada/gnat_ugn.texi $(srcdir)/ada/ug_words \ doc/projects.texi $(gcc_docdir)/include/gcc-common.texi gcc-vers.texi + $(MAKE) ada/doctools/xgnatugn$(build_exeext) ada/doctools/xgnatugn unw $(srcdir)/ada/gnat_ugn.texi \ $(srcdir)/ada/ug_words doc/gnat_ugn.texi