From patchwork Thu Jan 12 16:44:03 2012 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Georg-Johann Lay X-Patchwork-Id: 135650 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 66E0EB6F13 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 03:44:41 +1100 (EST) Comment: DKIM? See http://www.dkim.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; x=1326991482; h=Comment: DomainKey-Signature:Received:Received:Received:Received: Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mailing-List:Precedence: List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:Sender: Delivered-To; bh=70oWIk2w7G/ONv1aUXZvVy4dskw=; b=jm7i8DFpWLSb/Y1 CYDCiyZ7w5AMSv4AWWkuPS79sGAhd4xEksW7VYxDZPrdUo9XXUGLPFBx4JbPxJqz 0Zf0JwEHi1VTuNDcdKdqjv28e2/McB/sTj09eoMSXI5y/kAemWTs2ipCRBoYE7VE MntW1XXd+92DAHSBnSPNIHiv7sHE= Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=Received:Received:X-SWARE-Spam-Status:X-Spam-Check-By:Received:X-RZG-AUTH:X-RZG-CLASS-ID:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-IsSubscribed:Mailing-List:Precedence:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:Sender:Delivered-To; b=KFv6XG5rKHoc9+Z9t0NGNljyWcyMbL4a/AdHck5rUGblnpNTYRfy5kbhUXsXX+ 5eL43X+gFxBva02QxapbouYPE2jZgQsD+YzRBXoNP3S5Yr3InZLOGMo4AfdS7u6v L7mNDwc2S1i0LmtGiTC5WoigXX343nzqlCcPVe0lt7Io0=; Received: (qmail 27872 invoked by alias); 12 Jan 2012 16:44:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 27704 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Jan 2012 16:44:30 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mo-p00-ob.rzone.de (HELO mo-p00-ob.rzone.de) (81.169.146.161) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:44:17 +0000 X-RZG-AUTH: :LXoWVUeid/7A29J/hMvvT2k715jHQaJercGObUOFkj18odoYNahU4Q== X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Received: from [192.168.0.22] (business-188-111-022-002.static.arcor-ip.net [188.111.22.2]) by smtp.strato.de (klopstock mo35) (RZmta 27.3 AUTH) with ESMTPA id a07237o0CG0ugA ; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 17:44:03 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <4F0F0DD3.60405@gjlay.de> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 17:44:03 +0100 From: Georg-Johann Lay User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org CC: Matthew Gretton-Dann , Mike Stump Subject: [patch,testuite]: Fix bad testcase assuming int = int32_t X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Again: A test case that fails because it incorrectly assumes int is 32 bits wide. Ok to apply? * gcc.c-torture/execute/20120111-1.c: Fix wrong int = int32_t assumption. Index: gcc.c-torture/execute/20120111-1.c =================================================================== --- gcc.c-torture/execute/20120111-1.c (revision 183128) +++ gcc.c-torture/execute/20120111-1.c (working copy) @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ uint32_t f0a (uint64_t arg2) __attribute uint32_t f0a (uint64_t arg) { - return ~(arg > -3); + return ~((unsigned) (arg > -3)); } int main() {