From patchwork Fri Jul 15 12:11:18 2011
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Patchwork-Submitter: Bernd Schmidt <bernds@codesourcery.com>
X-Patchwork-Id: 104807
Return-Path: 
 <gcc-patches-return-296963-incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org>
X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org
Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org
Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131])
	by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A09CFB6F18
	for <incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org>;
	Fri, 15 Jul 2011 22:11:46 +1000 (EST)
Received: (qmail 32633 invoked by alias); 15 Jul 2011 12:11:44 -0000
Received: (qmail 32606 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Jul 2011 12:11:41 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0	tests=AWL, BAYES_00,
	RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com)
	(38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with
	ESMTP; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 12:11:23 +0000
Received: (qmail 8578 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2011 12:11:22 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?84.152.208.173?) (bernds@127.0.0.2) by
	mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 15 Jul 2011 12:11:22 -0000
Message-ID: <4E202E66.2060406@codesourcery.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 14:11:18 +0200
From: Bernd Schmidt <bernds@codesourcery.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;
	rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110708 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
CC: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: C6X port 11/11: Testcases
References: <4DC956D0.3040306@codesourcery.com>
	<4DC95F01.9020706@codesourcery.com>	<4E200BED.9080606@codesourcery.com>
	<CAMe9rOpthcaCK5Yx4rsMZq4CaVpjCZYNvLtkFOxEuy-uctbENA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAMe9rOpthcaCK5Yx4rsMZq4CaVpjCZYNvLtkFOxEuy-uctbENA@mail.gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: 
 <mailto:gcc-patches-unsubscribe-incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org

On 07/15/11 14:06, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 2:44 AM, Bernd Schmidt <bernds@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>> On 05/10/11 17:51, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>>> This contains the testsuite changes for the C6X port.
>>
>> Committed this version. No one commented about the changes outside
>> gcc.target/tic6x, but I think they are reasonably obvious. I'm open to
>> suggestions for other names for the check_effective_target functions.
>>
>>
> 
> I think this caused:
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49757

Fixed.


Bernd

Index: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog	(revision 176310)
+++ gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog	(working copy)
@@ -32,6 +32,10 @@
 	* gcc.dg/torture/pr37868.c: Skip on tic6x.
 	* gcc.dg/torture/builtin-math-7.c: Likewise.
 
+	PR testsuite/49757
+	* gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/tic6x/builtins/c6x-builtins.exp: Return if
+	not testing tic6x-*-*.
+
 2011-07-14  Andrew Pinski  <pinskia@gmail.com>
 
 	PR tree-opt/49309
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/tic6x/builtins/c6x-builtins.exp
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/tic6x/builtins/c6x-builtins.exp	(revision 176310)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/tic6x/builtins/c6x-builtins.exp	(working copy)
@@ -19,6 +19,10 @@
 
 load_lib gcc-dg.exp
 
+if { ![istarget tic6x-*-*] } then {
+  return
+}
+
 dg-init
 gcc-dg-runtest [lsort [glob $srcdir/$subdir/*.c]] ""
 dg-finish