Message ID | 4DE51266.8040607@linux.vnet.ibm.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Pat Haugen <pthaugen@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > The following patch fixes an issue I noticed where vr0..vr2 were > inadvertently included in NON_FLOAT_REGS. > > Bootstrap/regtest on powerpc64-linux with no new regressions. Ok for trunk? > > -Pat > > > 2011-05-31 Pat Haugen <pthaugen@us.ibm.com> > > * config/rs6000/rs6000.h (REG_CLASS_CONTENTS): Remove vr0..vr2 from > NON_FLOAT_REGS. Okay. Thanks, David
On 05/31/2011 02:18 PM, David Edelsohn wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Pat Haugen > <pthaugen@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: >> > The following patch fixes an issue I noticed where vr0..vr2 were >> > inadvertently included in NON_FLOAT_REGS. >> > >> > Bootstrap/regtest on powerpc64-linux with no new regressions. Ok for trunk? >> > >> > -Pat >> > >> > >> > 2011-05-31 Pat Haugen<pthaugen@us.ibm.com> >> > >> > * config/rs6000/rs6000.h (REG_CLASS_CONTENTS): Remove vr0..vr2 from >> > NON_FLOAT_REGS. > Okay. > I should have asked before, ok for 4.6 also after bootstrap/regtest? -Pat
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 8:41 AM, Pat Haugen <pthaugen@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> I should have asked before, ok for 4.6 also after bootstrap/regtest?
Yes.
Thanks, David
Index: gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.h =================================================================== --- gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.h (revision 174304) +++ gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.h (working copy) @@ -1224,7 +1224,7 @@ enum reg_class { 0xffffffff, 0x00000000, 0x0000000f, 0x00022000 }, /* SPEC_OR_GEN_REGS */ \ { 0x00000000, 0x00000000, 0x00000010, 0x00000000 }, /* CR0_REGS */ \ { 0x00000000, 0x00000000, 0x00000ff0, 0x00000000 }, /* CR_REGS */ \ - { 0xffffffff, 0x00000000, 0x0000efff, 0x00020000 }, /* NON_FLOAT_REGS */ \ + { 0xffffffff, 0x00000000, 0x00000fff, 0x00020000 }, /* NON_FLOAT_REGS */ \ { 0x00000000, 0x00000000, 0x00001000, 0x00000000 }, /* CA_REGS */ \ { 0xffffffff, 0xffffffff, 0xffffffff, 0x0003ffff } /* ALL_REGS */ \ }