diff mbox

C++ PATCHes to restrictions on constexpr functions

Message ID 4D90B319.6000000@redhat.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Jason Merrill March 28, 2011, 4:11 p.m. UTC 
The resolution of core issue 898 ratifies our current behavior of 
allowing typedefs and static_assert in constexpr functions.  It also 
allows using decls/directives.  We discussed allowing unnecessary 
braces, but decided not to.  So these patches 1) allow using and 2) 
prohibit extra compound-statements.

Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk and 4.6.
commit 8e9828f2e972534d81a6c409ff68c77faeb99ed6
Author: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue Mar 22 18:25:56 2011 +0100

    	Core 898
    	* semantics.c (constexpr_fn_retval): New.  Allow using-declaration
    	and using-definition.
    	(register_constexpr_fundef): Call it.
commit 93ed9ae1cfa1856f713f67c9de812ad7e49e2b66
Author: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri Mar 25 17:40:20 2011 +0100

    	Core 898
    	* parser.c (cp_parser_compound_statement): Add function_body parm.
    	Complain about non-body compound-stmt in constexpr fn.
    	(cp_parser_primary_expression, cp_parser_statement): Adjust.
    	(cp_parser_implicitly_scoped_statement): Adjust.
    	(cp_parser_function_body, cp_parser_try_block): Adjust.
    	(cp_parser_handler, cp_parser_objc_synchronized_statement): Adjust.
    	(cp_parser_objc_try_catch_finally_statement): Adjust.

diff --git a/gcc/cp/parser.c b/gcc/cp/parser.c
index c7347cf..3a60d0f 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/parser.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/parser.c
@@ -1590,7 +1590,7 @@ static void cp_parser_label_for_labeled_statement
 static tree cp_parser_expression_statement
   (cp_parser *, tree);
 static tree cp_parser_compound_statement
-  (cp_parser *, tree, bool);
+  (cp_parser *, tree, bool, bool);
 static void cp_parser_statement_seq_opt
   (cp_parser *, tree);
 static tree cp_parser_selection_statement
@@ -3417,7 +3417,7 @@ cp_parser_primary_expression (cp_parser *parser,
 		/* Start the statement-expression.  */
 		expr = begin_stmt_expr ();
 		/* Parse the compound-statement.  */
-		cp_parser_compound_statement (parser, expr, false);
+		cp_parser_compound_statement (parser, expr, false, false);
 		/* Finish up.  */
 		expr = finish_stmt_expr (expr, false);
 	      }
@@ -7873,7 +7873,7 @@ cp_parser_statement (cp_parser* parser, tree in_statement_expr,
     }
   /* Anything that starts with a `{' must be a compound-statement.  */
   else if (token->type == CPP_OPEN_BRACE)
-    statement = cp_parser_compound_statement (parser, NULL, false);
+    statement = cp_parser_compound_statement (parser, NULL, false, false);
   /* CPP_PRAGMA is a #pragma inside a function body, which constitutes
      a statement all its own.  */
   else if (token->type == CPP_PRAGMA)
@@ -8105,13 +8105,17 @@ cp_parser_expression_statement (cp_parser* parser, tree in_statement_expr)
 
 static tree
 cp_parser_compound_statement (cp_parser *parser, tree in_statement_expr,
-			      bool in_try)
+			      bool in_try, bool function_body)
 {
   tree compound_stmt;
 
   /* Consume the `{'.  */
   if (!cp_parser_require (parser, CPP_OPEN_BRACE, RT_OPEN_BRACE))
     return error_mark_node;
+  if (DECL_DECLARED_CONSTEXPR_P (current_function_decl)
+      && !function_body)
+    pedwarn (input_location, OPT_pedantic,
+	     "compound-statement in constexpr function");
   /* Begin the compound-statement.  */
   compound_stmt = begin_compound_stmt (in_try ? BCS_TRY_BLOCK : 0);
   /* If the next keyword is `__label__' we have a label declaration.  */
@@ -9022,7 +9026,7 @@ cp_parser_implicitly_scoped_statement (cp_parser* parser, bool *if_p)
     }
   /* if a compound is opened, we simply parse the statement directly.  */
   else if (cp_lexer_next_token_is (parser->lexer, CPP_OPEN_BRACE))
-    statement = cp_parser_compound_statement (parser, NULL, false);
+    statement = cp_parser_compound_statement (parser, NULL, false, false);
   /* If the token is not a `{', then we must take special action.  */
   else
     {
@@ -16157,7 +16161,7 @@ cp_parser_default_argument (cp_parser *parser, bool template_parm_p)
 static void
 cp_parser_function_body (cp_parser *parser)
 {
-  cp_parser_compound_statement (parser, NULL, false);
+  cp_parser_compound_statement (parser, NULL, false, true);
 }
 
 /* Parse a ctor-initializer-opt followed by a function-body.  Return
@@ -18255,7 +18259,7 @@ cp_parser_try_block (cp_parser* parser)
 
   cp_parser_require_keyword (parser, RID_TRY, RT_TRY);
   try_block = begin_try_block ();
-  cp_parser_compound_statement (parser, NULL, true);
+  cp_parser_compound_statement (parser, NULL, true, false);
   finish_try_block (try_block);
   cp_parser_handler_seq (parser);
   finish_handler_sequence (try_block);
@@ -18332,7 +18336,7 @@ cp_parser_handler (cp_parser* parser)
   declaration = cp_parser_exception_declaration (parser);
   finish_handler_parms (declaration, handler);
   cp_parser_require (parser, CPP_CLOSE_PAREN, RT_CLOSE_PAREN);
-  cp_parser_compound_statement (parser, NULL, false);
+  cp_parser_compound_statement (parser, NULL, false, false);
   finish_handler (handler);
 }
 
@@ -22533,7 +22537,7 @@ cp_parser_objc_try_catch_finally_statement (cp_parser *parser)
   /* NB: The @try block needs to be wrapped in its own STATEMENT_LIST
      node, lest it get absorbed into the surrounding block.  */
   stmt = push_stmt_list ();
-  cp_parser_compound_statement (parser, NULL, false);
+  cp_parser_compound_statement (parser, NULL, false, false);
   objc_begin_try_stmt (location, pop_stmt_list (stmt));
 
   while (cp_lexer_next_token_is_keyword (parser->lexer, RID_AT_CATCH))
@@ -22589,7 +22593,7 @@ cp_parser_objc_try_catch_finally_statement (cp_parser *parser)
 	     forget about the closing parenthesis and keep going.  */
 	}
       objc_begin_catch_clause (parameter_declaration);
-      cp_parser_compound_statement (parser, NULL, false);
+      cp_parser_compound_statement (parser, NULL, false, false);
       objc_finish_catch_clause ();
     }
   if (cp_lexer_next_token_is_keyword (parser->lexer, RID_AT_FINALLY))
@@ -22599,7 +22603,7 @@ cp_parser_objc_try_catch_finally_statement (cp_parser *parser)
       /* NB: The @finally block needs to be wrapped in its own STATEMENT_LIST
 	 node, lest it get absorbed into the surrounding block.  */
       stmt = push_stmt_list ();
-      cp_parser_compound_statement (parser, NULL, false);
+      cp_parser_compound_statement (parser, NULL, false, false);
       objc_build_finally_clause (location, pop_stmt_list (stmt));
     }
 
@@ -22630,7 +22634,7 @@ cp_parser_objc_synchronized_statement (cp_parser *parser)
   /* NB: The @synchronized block needs to be wrapped in its own STATEMENT_LIST
      node, lest it get absorbed into the surrounding block.  */
   stmt = push_stmt_list ();
-  cp_parser_compound_statement (parser, NULL, false);
+  cp_parser_compound_statement (parser, NULL, false, false);
 
   return objc_build_synchronized (location, lock, pop_stmt_list (stmt));
 }
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-compound.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-compound.C
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..81fcc54
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-compound.C
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+// { dg-options "-std=c++0x -pedantic-errors" }
+
+constexpr int f()
+{
+  {				// { dg-error "" }
+    return 1;
+  }
+  { }				// { dg-error "" }
+}
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/gcc/cp/semantics.c b/gcc/cp/semantics.c
index 41ab858..6906c1b 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/semantics.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/semantics.c
@@ -5585,6 +5585,52 @@  build_constexpr_constructor_member_initializers (tree type, tree body)
     return error_mark_node;
 }
 
+/* Subroutine of register_constexpr_fundef.  BODY is the body of a function
+   declared to be constexpr, or a sub-statement thereof.  Returns the
+   return value if suitable, error_mark_node for a statement not allowed in
+   a constexpr function, or NULL_TREE if no return value was found.  */
+
+static tree
+constexpr_fn_retval (tree body)
+{
+  switch (TREE_CODE (body))
+    {
+    case STATEMENT_LIST:
+      {
+	tree_stmt_iterator i;
+	tree expr = NULL_TREE;
+	for (i = tsi_start (body); !tsi_end_p (i); tsi_next (&i))
+	  {
+	    tree s = constexpr_fn_retval (tsi_stmt (i));
+	    if (s == error_mark_node)
+	      return error_mark_node;
+	    else if (s == NULL_TREE)
+	      /* Keep iterating.  */;
+	    else if (expr)
+	      /* Multiple return statements.  */
+	      return error_mark_node;
+	    else
+	      expr = s;
+	  }
+	return expr;
+      }
+
+    case RETURN_EXPR:
+      return unshare_expr (TREE_OPERAND (body, 0));
+
+    case DECL_EXPR:
+      if (TREE_CODE (DECL_EXPR_DECL (body)) == USING_DECL)
+	return NULL_TREE;
+      return error_mark_node;
+
+    case USING_STMT:
+      return NULL_TREE;
+
+    default:
+      return error_mark_node;
+    }
+}
+
 /* We are processing the definition of the constexpr function FUN.
    Check that its BODY fulfills the propriate requirements and
    enter it in the constexpr function definition table.
@@ -5610,13 +5656,13 @@  register_constexpr_fundef (tree fun, tree body)
 	body = TREE_OPERAND (body, 0);
       if (TREE_CODE (body) == CLEANUP_POINT_EXPR)
         body = TREE_OPERAND (body, 0);
-      if (TREE_CODE (body) != RETURN_EXPR)
+      body = constexpr_fn_retval (body);
+      if (body == NULL_TREE || body == error_mark_node)
         {
           error ("body of constexpr function %qD not a return-statement", fun);
           DECL_DECLARED_CONSTEXPR_P (fun) = false;
           return NULL;
         }
-      body = unshare_expr (TREE_OPERAND (body, 0));
     }
 
   if (!potential_rvalue_constant_expression (body))
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-using.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-using.C
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..fc794e9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-using.C
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ 
+// Core issue 898
+// { dg-options -std=c++0x }
+
+namespace N { const int i = 42; }
+namespace M { const int j = 42; }
+
+constexpr int g() {
+  using namespace N;
+  using M::j;
+  static_assert (i == 42, "i == 42");
+  return i + j;
+}
+
+template <class T>
+constexpr int h() {
+  using namespace N;
+  using M::j;
+  static_assert (i == 42, "i == 42");
+  return i + j;
+}
+
+constexpr int i = g();
+constexpr int i2 = h<int>();
+
+static_assert (i == 84, "i == 84");
+static_assert (i2 == 84, "i2 == 84");
+