@@ -7525,6 +7525,9 @@ compute_array_index_type (tree name, tree size, tsubst_flags_t complain)
if (size == error_mark_node)
return error_mark_node;
type = TREE_TYPE (size);
+ /* We didn't support this case in GCC 3.2, so don't bother
+ trying to model it now in ABI v1. */
+ abi_1_itype = error_mark_node;
}
size = maybe_constant_value (size);
@@ -7569,7 +7572,8 @@ compute_array_index_type (tree name, tree size, tsubst_flags_t complain)
return itype;
}
- if (!abi_version_at_least (2) && processing_template_decl)
+ if (!abi_version_at_least (2) && processing_template_decl
+ && abi_1_itype == NULL_TREE)
/* For abi-1, we handled all instances in templates the same way,
even when they were non-dependent. This affects the manglings
produced. So, we do the normal checking for non-dependent
@@ -7683,7 +7687,7 @@ compute_array_index_type (tree name, tree size, tsubst_flags_t complain)
}
/* Create and return the appropriate index type. */
- if (abi_1_itype)
+ if (abi_1_itype && abi_1_itype != error_mark_node)
{
tree t = build_index_type (itype);
TYPE_CANONICAL (abi_1_itype) = TYPE_CANONICAL (t);
new file mode 100644
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+// PR c++/47301
+// { dg-options "-std=c++0x -fabi-version=1" }
+
+struct A
+{
+ constexpr operator int ()
+ {
+ return 1;
+ }
+};
+
+template < int > struct B
+{
+ static constexpr A a = A();
+ int ar[a];
+};