Message ID | 4C62CCA4.5060004@codesourcery.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On 08/11/2010 09:15 AM, Jie Zhang wrote: > According to Sebastian's suggestion: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2010-08/msg00188.html > > I wrote this patch to reduce the memory usage of > gcc.dg/graphite/interchange-9.c. Tested on x86_64. OK? Ok. r~
On 08/12/2010 12:31 AM, Richard Henderson wrote: > On 08/11/2010 09:15 AM, Jie Zhang wrote: >> According to Sebastian's suggestion: >> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2010-08/msg00188.html >> >> I wrote this patch to reduce the memory usage of >> gcc.dg/graphite/interchange-9.c. Tested on x86_64. OK? > > Ok. > Thanks. Committed on trunk.
* gcc.dg/graphite/interchange-9.c (M): Define to be 111. (N): Likewise. (main): Adjust accordingly. Index: gcc.dg/graphite/interchange-9.c =================================================================== --- gcc.dg/graphite/interchange-9.c (revision 163100) +++ gcc.dg/graphite/interchange-9.c (working copy) @@ -5,8 +5,8 @@ #include <stdio.h> #endif -#define N 1111 -#define M 1111 +#define N 111 +#define M 111 static int __attribute__((noinline)) foo (int *x) @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ main (void) fprintf (stderr, "res = %d \n", res); #endif - if (res != 2468642) + if (res != 24642) abort (); return 0;