| Message ID | 2446339.CApKStLQZQ@e108577-lin |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/29_atomics/atomic/65913.cc b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/29_atomics/atomic/65913.cc index 713ef42d03cb9f7c1e691995df2d0943e24036c3..32a58ec991b41c74aafab84deed2c543d72505f5 100644 --- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/29_atomics/atomic/65913.cc +++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/29_atomics/atomic/65913.cc @@ -15,7 +15,8 @@ // with this library; see the file COPYING3. If not see // <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. -// { dg-do run { target x86_64-*-linux* powerpc*-*-linux* } } +// { dg-do run } +// { dg-require-atomic-builtins "" } // { dg-options "-std=gnu++11 -O0" } #include <atomic>
[Sorry for the large recipient list, I wasn't sure who of C++ and x86 maintainers should approve this] Hi, 29_atomics/atomic/65913.cc test in libstdc++ is a runtime test that only rely on atomic and gnu++11 support. Therefore I propose to require atomic-builtins instead of an x86 (32 or 64 bits) target. ChangeLog entry is as follows: 2016-05-19 Thomas Preud'homme <thomas.preudhomme@arm.com> * testsuite/29_atomics/atomic/65913.cc: Require atomic-builtins rather than specific target. Patch is in attachment. Is this ok for trunk? Best regards, Thomas