@@ -2081,6 +2081,8 @@ public:
void accept_vis (ASTVisitor &vis) override;
+ bool has_expr () { return expression != nullptr; }
+
// TODO: is this better? Or is a "vis_block" better?
std::unique_ptr<Expr> &get_expr ()
{
@@ -177,12 +177,43 @@ DefaultResolver::visit (AST::StructExprFieldIndexValue &)
{}
void
-DefaultResolver::visit (AST::ClosureExprInner &)
-{}
+DefaultResolver::visit (AST::ClosureExprInner &expr)
+{
+ if (expr.is_marked_for_strip ())
+ return;
+
+ for (auto ¶m : expr.get_params ())
+ {
+ if (param.is_error ())
+ continue;
+
+ param.get_pattern ()->accept_vis (*this);
+ if (param.has_type_given ())
+ param.get_type ()->accept_vis (*this);
+ }
+
+ expr.get_definition_expr ()->accept_vis (*this);
+}
void
-DefaultResolver::visit (AST::ClosureExprInnerTyped &)
-{}
+DefaultResolver::visit (AST::ClosureExprInnerTyped &expr)
+{
+ if (expr.is_marked_for_strip ())
+ return;
+
+ for (auto ¶m : expr.get_params ())
+ {
+ if (param.is_error ())
+ continue;
+
+ param.get_pattern ()->accept_vis (*this);
+ if (param.has_type_given ())
+ param.get_type ()->accept_vis (*this);
+ }
+
+ expr.get_definition_block ()->accept_vis (*this);
+ expr.get_return_type ()->accept_vis (*this);
+}
void
DefaultResolver::visit (AST::ContinueExpr &expr)
@@ -230,11 +261,18 @@ DefaultResolver::visit (AST::WhileLetLoopExpr &expr)
void
DefaultResolver::visit (AST::IfExpr &expr)
-{}
+{
+ expr.get_condition_expr ()->accept_vis (*this);
+ expr.get_if_block ()->accept_vis (*this);
+}
void
-DefaultResolver::visit (AST::IfExprConseqElse &)
-{}
+DefaultResolver::visit (AST::IfExprConseqElse &expr)
+{
+ expr.get_condition_expr ()->accept_vis (*this);
+ expr.get_if_block ()->accept_vis (*this);
+ expr.get_else_block ()->accept_vis (*this);
+}
void
DefaultResolver::visit (AST::IfLetExpr &expr)
@@ -246,7 +284,20 @@ DefaultResolver::visit (AST::IfLetExprConseqElse &)
void
DefaultResolver::visit (AST::MatchExpr &expr)
-{}
+{
+ if (expr.is_marked_for_strip ())
+ return;
+
+ expr.get_scrutinee_expr ()->accept_vis (*this);
+ for (auto &arm : expr.get_match_cases ())
+ {
+ arm.get_expr ()->accept_vis (*this);
+ for (auto &pat : arm.get_arm ().get_patterns ())
+ pat->accept_vis (*this);
+ if (arm.get_arm ().has_match_arm_guard ())
+ arm.get_arm ().get_guard_expr ()->accept_vis (*this);
+ }
+}
void
DefaultResolver::visit (AST::AwaitExpr &expr)
@@ -277,8 +328,21 @@ DefaultResolver::visit (AST::ConstGenericParam &)
{}
void
-DefaultResolver::visit (AST::PathInExpression &)
-{}
+DefaultResolver::visit (AST::PathInExpression &expr)
+{
+ for (auto &seg : expr.get_segments ())
+ if (seg.has_generic_args ())
+ {
+ auto &args = seg.get_generic_args ();
+ for (auto &arg : args.get_generic_args ())
+ arg.accept_vis (*this);
+ for (auto &arg : args.get_binding_args ())
+ if (!arg.is_error ())
+ arg.get_type ()->accept_vis (*this);
+ for (auto &arg : args.get_lifetime_args ())
+ arg.accept_vis (*this);
+ }
+}
void
DefaultResolver::visit (AST::TypePathSegmentGeneric &)
@@ -373,16 +437,25 @@ DefaultResolver::visit (AST::EnumItem &)
{}
void
-DefaultResolver::visit (AST::EnumItemTuple &)
-{}
+DefaultResolver::visit (AST::EnumItemTuple &item)
+{
+ for (auto &field : item.get_tuple_fields ())
+ field.get_field_type ()->accept_vis (*this);
+}
void
-DefaultResolver::visit (AST::EnumItemStruct &)
-{}
+DefaultResolver::visit (AST::EnumItemStruct &item)
+{
+ for (auto &field : item.get_struct_fields ())
+ field.get_field_type ()->accept_vis (*this);
+}
void
-DefaultResolver::visit (AST::EnumItemDiscriminant &)
-{}
+DefaultResolver::visit (AST::EnumItemDiscriminant &item)
+{
+ if (item.has_expr ())
+ item.get_expr ()->accept_vis (*this);
+}
void
DefaultResolver::visit (AST::ConstantItem &item)