diff mbox series

[v5,2/3,RFC] ifcvt: Allow more operations in multiple set if conversion

Message ID 20240726082501.4086489-3-manolis.tsamis@vrull.eu
State New
Headers show
Series ifcvt: Allow if conversion of arithmetic in basic blocks with multiple sets | expand

Commit Message

Manolis Tsamis July 26, 2024, 8:25 a.m. UTC
Currently the operations allowed for if conversion of a basic block with
multiple sets are few, namely REG, SUBREG and CONST_INT (as controlled by
bb_ok_for_noce_convert_multiple_sets).

This commit allows more operations (arithmetic, compare, etc) to participate
in if conversion. The target's profitability hook and ifcvt's costing is
expected to reject sequences that are unprofitable.

This is especially useful for targets which provide a rich selection of
conditional instructions (like aarch64 which has cinc, csneg, csinv, ccmp, ...)
which are currently not used in basic blocks with more than a single set.

gcc/ChangeLog:

	* ifcvt.cc (try_emit_cmove_seq): Modify comments.
	(noce_convert_multiple_sets_1): Modify comments.
	(bb_ok_for_noce_convert_multiple_sets): Allow more operations.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* gcc.target/aarch64/ifcvt_multiple_sets_arithm.c: New test.

Signed-off-by: Manolis Tsamis <manolis.tsamis@vrull.eu>
---

Changes in v5:
        - Loop over SEQ and check modified_in_p for all instructions.
        - Fix x86-related bug when SEQ modifies COND.

 gcc/ifcvt.cc                                  | 34 +++-----
 .../aarch64/ifcvt_multiple_sets_arithm.c      | 79 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/ifcvt_multiple_sets_arithm.c
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/gcc/ifcvt.cc b/gcc/ifcvt.cc
index ff6c934c613..2a5e5e5b608 100644
--- a/gcc/ifcvt.cc
+++ b/gcc/ifcvt.cc
@@ -3432,13 +3432,13 @@  try_emit_cmove_seq (struct noce_if_info *if_info, rtx temp,
 /* We have something like:
 
      if (x > y)
-       { i = a; j = b; k = c; }
+       { i = EXPR_A; j = EXPR_B; k = EXPR_C; }
 
    Make it:
 
-     tmp_i = (x > y) ? a : i;
-     tmp_j = (x > y) ? b : j;
-     tmp_k = (x > y) ? c : k;
+     tmp_i = (x > y) ? EXPR_A : i;
+     tmp_j = (x > y) ? EXPR_B : j;
+     tmp_k = (x > y) ? EXPR_C : k;
      i = tmp_i;
      j = tmp_j;
      k = tmp_k;
@@ -3857,11 +3857,10 @@  noce_convert_multiple_sets_1 (struct noce_if_info *if_info,
 
 
 
-/* Return true iff basic block TEST_BB is comprised of only
-   (SET (REG) (REG)) insns suitable for conversion to a series
-   of conditional moves.  Also check that we have more than one set
-   (other routines can handle a single set better than we would), and
-   fewer than PARAM_MAX_RTL_IF_CONVERSION_INSNS sets.  While going
+/* Return true iff basic block TEST_BB is suitable for conversion to a
+   series of conditional moves.  Also check that we have more than one
+   set (other routines can handle a single set better than we would),
+   and fewer than PARAM_MAX_RTL_IF_CONVERSION_INSNS sets.  While going
    through the insns store the sum of their potential costs in COST.  */
 
 static bool
@@ -3887,20 +3886,13 @@  bb_ok_for_noce_convert_multiple_sets (basic_block test_bb, unsigned *cost)
       rtx dest = SET_DEST (set);
       rtx src = SET_SRC (set);
 
-      /* We can possibly relax this, but for now only handle REG to REG
-	 (including subreg) moves.  This avoids any issues that might come
-	 from introducing loads/stores that might violate data-race-freedom
-	 guarantees.  */
-      if (!REG_P (dest))
-	return false;
-
-      if (!((REG_P (src) || CONSTANT_P (src))
-	    || (GET_CODE (src) == SUBREG && REG_P (SUBREG_REG (src))
-	      && subreg_lowpart_p (src))))
+      /* Do not handle anything involving memory loads/stores since it might
+	 violate data-race-freedom guarantees.  */
+      if (!REG_P (dest) || contains_mem_rtx_p (src))
 	return false;
 
-      /* Destination must be appropriate for a conditional write.  */
-      if (!noce_operand_ok (dest))
+      /* Destination and source must be appropriate.  */
+      if (!noce_operand_ok (dest) || !noce_operand_ok (src))
 	return false;
 
       /* We must be able to conditionally move in this mode.  */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/ifcvt_multiple_sets_arithm.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/ifcvt_multiple_sets_arithm.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..ba7f948aba5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/ifcvt_multiple_sets_arithm.c
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@ 
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-rtl-ce1" } */
+
+void sink2(int, int);
+void sink3(int, int, int);
+
+void cond1(int cond, int x, int y)
+{
+  if (cond)
+    {
+      x = x << 4;
+      y = 1;
+    }
+
+  sink2(x, y);
+}
+
+void cond2(int cond, int x, int y)
+{
+  if (cond)
+    {
+      x++;
+      y++;
+    }
+
+  sink2(x, y);
+}
+
+void cond3(int cond, int x1, int x2, int x3)
+{
+  if (cond)
+    {
+      x1++;
+      x2++;
+      x3++;
+    }
+
+  sink3(x1, x2, x3);
+}
+
+void cond4(int cond, int x, int y)
+{
+  if (cond)
+    {
+      x += 2;
+      y += 3;
+    }
+
+  sink2(x, y);
+}
+
+void cond5(int cond, int x, int y, int r1, int r2)
+{
+  if (cond)
+    {
+      x = r1 + 2;
+      y = r2 - 34;
+    }
+
+  sink2(x, y);
+}
+
+void cond6(int cond, int x, int y)
+{
+  if (cond)
+    {
+      x = -x;
+      y = ~y;
+    }
+
+  sink2(x, y);
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "cinc\t" 5 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "csneg\t" 1 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "csinv\t" 1 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "csel\t" } } */
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump-times "if-conversion succeeded through noce_convert_multiple_sets" 6 "ce1" } } */