| Message ID | 20240702032336.2766166-1-hongyu.wang@intel.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [APX,PPX] Avoid generating unmatched pushp/popp in pro/epilogue | expand |
On Tue, Jul 2, 2024 at 5:24 AM Hongyu Wang <hongyu.wang@intel.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > According to APX spec, the pushp/popp pairs should be matched, > otherwise the PPX hint cannot take effect and cause performance loss. > > In the ix86_expand_epilogue, there are several optimizations that may > cause the epilogue using mov to restore the regs. Check if PPX applied > and prevent usage of mov/leave in the epilogue. Isn't it true in general that mismatched push/pop confuses a CPUs stack engine? Does the distance of the push/pop make any difference here or in general? > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. > > Ok for trunk? > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > * config/i386/i386.cc (ix86_expand_prologue): Set apx_ppx_used > flag in m.fs with TARGET_APX_PPX && !crtl->calls_eh_return. > (ix86_emit_save_regs): Emit ppx is available only when > TARGET_APX_PPX && !crtl->calls_eh_return. > (ix86_expand_epilogue): Don't restore reg using mov when > apx_ppx_used flag is true. > * config/i386/i386.h (struct machine_frame_state): > Add apx_ppx_used flag. > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > * gcc.target/i386/apx-ppx-2.c: New test. > * gcc.target/i386/apx-ppx-3.c: Likewise. > --- > gcc/config/i386/i386.cc | 13 +++++++++---- > gcc/config/i386/i386.h | 4 ++++ > gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/apx-ppx-2.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ > gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/apx-ppx-3.c | 7 +++++++ > 4 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/apx-ppx-2.c > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/apx-ppx-3.c > > diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc b/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc > index bd7411190af..99def8d4a77 100644 > --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc > +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc > @@ -7429,6 +7429,7 @@ ix86_emit_save_regs (void) > { > int regno; > rtx_insn *insn; > + bool use_ppx = TARGET_APX_PPX && !crtl->calls_eh_return; > > if (!TARGET_APX_PUSH2POP2 > || !ix86_can_use_push2pop2 () > @@ -7438,7 +7439,7 @@ ix86_emit_save_regs (void) > if (GENERAL_REGNO_P (regno) && ix86_save_reg (regno, true, true)) > { > insn = emit_insn (gen_push (gen_rtx_REG (word_mode, regno), > - TARGET_APX_PPX)); > + use_ppx)); > RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P (insn) = 1; > } > } > @@ -7469,7 +7470,7 @@ ix86_emit_save_regs (void) > regno_list[0]), > gen_rtx_REG (word_mode, > regno_list[1]), > - TARGET_APX_PPX)); > + use_ppx)); > RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P (insn) = 1; > rtx dwarf = gen_rtx_SEQUENCE (VOIDmode, rtvec_alloc (3)); > > @@ -7502,7 +7503,7 @@ ix86_emit_save_regs (void) > else > { > insn = emit_insn (gen_push (gen_rtx_REG (word_mode, regno), > - TARGET_APX_PPX)); > + use_ppx)); > RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P (insn) = 1; > aligned = true; > } > @@ -7511,7 +7512,7 @@ ix86_emit_save_regs (void) > { > insn = emit_insn (gen_push (gen_rtx_REG (word_mode, > regno_list[0]), > - TARGET_APX_PPX)); > + use_ppx)); > RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P (insn) = 1; > } > } > @@ -8985,6 +8986,7 @@ ix86_expand_prologue (void) > if (!frame.save_regs_using_mov) > { > ix86_emit_save_regs (); > + m->fs.apx_ppx_used = TARGET_APX_PPX && !crtl->calls_eh_return; > int_registers_saved = true; > gcc_assert (m->fs.sp_offset == frame.reg_save_offset); > } > @@ -9870,6 +9872,9 @@ ix86_expand_epilogue (int style) > /* SEH requires the use of pops to identify the epilogue. */ > else if (TARGET_SEH) > restore_regs_via_mov = false; > + /* If we already save reg with pushp, don't use move at epilogue. */ > + else if (m->fs.apx_ppx_used) > + restore_regs_via_mov = false; > /* If we're only restoring one register and sp cannot be used then > using a move instruction to restore the register since it's > less work than reloading sp and popping the register. */ > diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.h b/gcc/config/i386/i386.h > index 147b12cd014..0c5292e1d64 100644 > --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.h > +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.h > @@ -2693,6 +2693,10 @@ struct GTY(()) machine_frame_state > The flags realigned and sp_realigned are mutually exclusive. */ > BOOL_BITFIELD sp_realigned : 1; > > + /* When APX_PPX used in prologue, force epilogue to emit > + popp instead of move and leave. */ > + BOOL_BITFIELD apx_ppx_used : 1; > + > /* If sp_realigned is set, this is the last valid offset from the CFA > that can be used for access with the frame pointer. */ > HOST_WIDE_INT sp_realigned_fp_last; > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/apx-ppx-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/apx-ppx-2.c > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000000..42a95340b55 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/apx-ppx-2.c > @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ > +/* { dg-do compile { target { ! ia32 } } } */ > +/* { dg-options "-O1 -mapx-features=ppx -fno-omit-frame-pointer" } */ > + > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "pushp" } } */ > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "popp" } } */ > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "leave" } } */ > + > +extern int bar (int a); > +extern int *q; > + > +void foo (int *a) > +{ > + q[2] = bar (q[1]); > +} > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/apx-ppx-3.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/apx-ppx-3.c > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000000..76931fbe294 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/apx-ppx-3.c > @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ > +/* { dg-do compile { target { ! ia32 } } } */ > +/* { dg-options "-O2 -mapx-features=ppx" } */ > + > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "pushp" } } */ > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "popp" } } */ > + > +#include "eh_return-2.c" > -- > 2.31.1 >
> Isn't it true in general that mismatched push/pop confuses a CPUs stack > engine? Does the distance of the push/pop make any difference here > or in general? We are not sure about the impact for distance, but the PPX hint was just a performance hint. As mentioned in the apx spec, the mismatched pushp/popp pair does confused the fast-forwarding logic and turns off the PPX optimization. We just need to make sure every pushp for a certain reg has corresponding popp for that reg. Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com> 于2024年7月2日周二 16:18写道： > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2024 at 5:24 AM Hongyu Wang <hongyu.wang@intel.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > According to APX spec, the pushp/popp pairs should be matched, > > otherwise the PPX hint cannot take effect and cause performance loss. > > > > In the ix86_expand_epilogue, there are several optimizations that may > > cause the epilogue using mov to restore the regs. Check if PPX applied > > and prevent usage of mov/leave in the epilogue. > > Isn't it true in general that mismatched push/pop confuses a CPUs stack > engine? Does the distance of the push/pop make any difference here > or in general? > > > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. > > > > Ok for trunk? > > > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > > > * config/i386/i386.cc (ix86_expand_prologue): Set apx_ppx_used > > flag in m.fs with TARGET_APX_PPX && !crtl->calls_eh_return. > > (ix86_emit_save_regs): Emit ppx is available only when > > TARGET_APX_PPX && !crtl->calls_eh_return. > > (ix86_expand_epilogue): Don't restore reg using mov when > > apx_ppx_used flag is true. > > * config/i386/i386.h (struct machine_frame_state): > > Add apx_ppx_used flag. > > > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > > > * gcc.target/i386/apx-ppx-2.c: New test. > > * gcc.target/i386/apx-ppx-3.c: Likewise. > > --- > > gcc/config/i386/i386.cc | 13 +++++++++---- > > gcc/config/i386/i386.h | 4 ++++ > > gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/apx-ppx-2.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ > > gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/apx-ppx-3.c | 7 +++++++ > > 4 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/apx-ppx-2.c > > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/apx-ppx-3.c > > > > diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc b/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc > > index bd7411190af..99def8d4a77 100644 > > --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc > > +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc > > @@ -7429,6 +7429,7 @@ ix86_emit_save_regs (void) > > { > > int regno; > > rtx_insn *insn; > > + bool use_ppx = TARGET_APX_PPX && !crtl->calls_eh_return; > > > > if (!TARGET_APX_PUSH2POP2 > > || !ix86_can_use_push2pop2 () > > @@ -7438,7 +7439,7 @@ ix86_emit_save_regs (void) > > if (GENERAL_REGNO_P (regno) && ix86_save_reg (regno, true, true)) > > { > > insn = emit_insn (gen_push (gen_rtx_REG (word_mode, regno), > > - TARGET_APX_PPX)); > > + use_ppx)); > > RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P (insn) = 1; > > } > > } > > @@ -7469,7 +7470,7 @@ ix86_emit_save_regs (void) > > regno_list[0]), > > gen_rtx_REG (word_mode, > > regno_list[1]), > > - TARGET_APX_PPX)); > > + use_ppx)); > > RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P (insn) = 1; > > rtx dwarf = gen_rtx_SEQUENCE (VOIDmode, rtvec_alloc (3)); > > > > @@ -7502,7 +7503,7 @@ ix86_emit_save_regs (void) > > else > > { > > insn = emit_insn (gen_push (gen_rtx_REG (word_mode, regno), > > - TARGET_APX_PPX)); > > + use_ppx)); > > RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P (insn) = 1; > > aligned = true; > > } > > @@ -7511,7 +7512,7 @@ ix86_emit_save_regs (void) > > { > > insn = emit_insn (gen_push (gen_rtx_REG (word_mode, > > regno_list[0]), > > - TARGET_APX_PPX)); > > + use_ppx)); > > RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P (insn) = 1; > > } > > } > > @@ -8985,6 +8986,7 @@ ix86_expand_prologue (void) > > if (!frame.save_regs_using_mov) > > { > > ix86_emit_save_regs (); > > + m->fs.apx_ppx_used = TARGET_APX_PPX && !crtl->calls_eh_return; > > int_registers_saved = true; > > gcc_assert (m->fs.sp_offset == frame.reg_save_offset); > > } > > @@ -9870,6 +9872,9 @@ ix86_expand_epilogue (int style) > > /* SEH requires the use of pops to identify the epilogue. */ > > else if (TARGET_SEH) > > restore_regs_via_mov = false; > > + /* If we already save reg with pushp, don't use move at epilogue. */ > > + else if (m->fs.apx_ppx_used) > > + restore_regs_via_mov = false; > > /* If we're only restoring one register and sp cannot be used then > > using a move instruction to restore the register since it's > > less work than reloading sp and popping the register. */ > > diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.h b/gcc/config/i386/i386.h > > index 147b12cd014..0c5292e1d64 100644 > > --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.h > > +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.h > > @@ -2693,6 +2693,10 @@ struct GTY(()) machine_frame_state > > The flags realigned and sp_realigned are mutually exclusive. */ > > BOOL_BITFIELD sp_realigned : 1; > > > > + /* When APX_PPX used in prologue, force epilogue to emit > > + popp instead of move and leave. */ > > + BOOL_BITFIELD apx_ppx_used : 1; > > + > > /* If sp_realigned is set, this is the last valid offset from the CFA > > that can be used for access with the frame pointer. */ > > HOST_WIDE_INT sp_realigned_fp_last; > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/apx-ppx-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/apx-ppx-2.c > > new file mode 100644 > > index 00000000000..42a95340b55 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/apx-ppx-2.c > > @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ > > +/* { dg-do compile { target { ! ia32 } } } */ > > +/* { dg-options "-O1 -mapx-features=ppx -fno-omit-frame-pointer" } */ > > + > > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "pushp" } } */ > > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "popp" } } */ > > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "leave" } } */ > > + > > +extern int bar (int a); > > +extern int *q; > > + > > +void foo (int *a) > > +{ > > + q[2] = bar (q[1]); > > +} > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/apx-ppx-3.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/apx-ppx-3.c > > new file mode 100644 > > index 00000000000..76931fbe294 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/apx-ppx-3.c > > @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ > > +/* { dg-do compile { target { ! ia32 } } } */ > > +/* { dg-options "-O2 -mapx-features=ppx" } */ > > + > > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "pushp" } } */ > > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "popp" } } */ > > + > > +#include "eh_return-2.c" > > -- > > 2.31.1 > >
On Tue, Jul 2, 2024 at 11:24 AM Hongyu Wang <hongyu.wang@intel.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > According to APX spec, the pushp/popp pairs should be matched, > otherwise the PPX hint cannot take effect and cause performance loss. > > In the ix86_expand_epilogue, there are several optimizations that may > cause the epilogue using mov to restore the regs. Check if PPX applied > and prevent usage of mov/leave in the epilogue. > > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. > > Ok for trunk? Ok. > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > * config/i386/i386.cc (ix86_expand_prologue): Set apx_ppx_used > flag in m.fs with TARGET_APX_PPX && !crtl->calls_eh_return. > (ix86_emit_save_regs): Emit ppx is available only when > TARGET_APX_PPX && !crtl->calls_eh_return. > (ix86_expand_epilogue): Don't restore reg using mov when > apx_ppx_used flag is true. > * config/i386/i386.h (struct machine_frame_state): > Add apx_ppx_used flag. > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > * gcc.target/i386/apx-ppx-2.c: New test. > * gcc.target/i386/apx-ppx-3.c: Likewise. > --- > gcc/config/i386/i386.cc | 13 +++++++++---- > gcc/config/i386/i386.h | 4 ++++ > gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/apx-ppx-2.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ > gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/apx-ppx-3.c | 7 +++++++ > 4 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/apx-ppx-2.c > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/apx-ppx-3.c > > diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc b/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc > index bd7411190af..99def8d4a77 100644 > --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc > +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc > @@ -7429,6 +7429,7 @@ ix86_emit_save_regs (void) > { > int regno; > rtx_insn *insn; > + bool use_ppx = TARGET_APX_PPX && !crtl->calls_eh_return; > > if (!TARGET_APX_PUSH2POP2 > || !ix86_can_use_push2pop2 () > @@ -7438,7 +7439,7 @@ ix86_emit_save_regs (void) > if (GENERAL_REGNO_P (regno) && ix86_save_reg (regno, true, true)) > { > insn = emit_insn (gen_push (gen_rtx_REG (word_mode, regno), > - TARGET_APX_PPX)); > + use_ppx)); > RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P (insn) = 1; > } > } > @@ -7469,7 +7470,7 @@ ix86_emit_save_regs (void) > regno_list[0]), > gen_rtx_REG (word_mode, > regno_list[1]), > - TARGET_APX_PPX)); > + use_ppx)); > RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P (insn) = 1; > rtx dwarf = gen_rtx_SEQUENCE (VOIDmode, rtvec_alloc (3)); > > @@ -7502,7 +7503,7 @@ ix86_emit_save_regs (void) > else > { > insn = emit_insn (gen_push (gen_rtx_REG (word_mode, regno), > - TARGET_APX_PPX)); > + use_ppx)); > RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P (insn) = 1; > aligned = true; > } > @@ -7511,7 +7512,7 @@ ix86_emit_save_regs (void) > { > insn = emit_insn (gen_push (gen_rtx_REG (word_mode, > regno_list[0]), > - TARGET_APX_PPX)); > + use_ppx)); > RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P (insn) = 1; > } > } > @@ -8985,6 +8986,7 @@ ix86_expand_prologue (void) > if (!frame.save_regs_using_mov) > { > ix86_emit_save_regs (); > + m->fs.apx_ppx_used = TARGET_APX_PPX && !crtl->calls_eh_return; > int_registers_saved = true; > gcc_assert (m->fs.sp_offset == frame.reg_save_offset); > } > @@ -9870,6 +9872,9 @@ ix86_expand_epilogue (int style) > /* SEH requires the use of pops to identify the epilogue. */ > else if (TARGET_SEH) > restore_regs_via_mov = false; > + /* If we already save reg with pushp, don't use move at epilogue. */ > + else if (m->fs.apx_ppx_used) > + restore_regs_via_mov = false; > /* If we're only restoring one register and sp cannot be used then > using a move instruction to restore the register since it's > less work than reloading sp and popping the register. */ > diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.h b/gcc/config/i386/i386.h > index 147b12cd014..0c5292e1d64 100644 > --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.h > +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.h > @@ -2693,6 +2693,10 @@ struct GTY(()) machine_frame_state > The flags realigned and sp_realigned are mutually exclusive. */ > BOOL_BITFIELD sp_realigned : 1; > > + /* When APX_PPX used in prologue, force epilogue to emit > + popp instead of move and leave. */ > + BOOL_BITFIELD apx_ppx_used : 1; > + > /* If sp_realigned is set, this is the last valid offset from the CFA > that can be used for access with the frame pointer. */ > HOST_WIDE_INT sp_realigned_fp_last; > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/apx-ppx-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/apx-ppx-2.c > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000000..42a95340b55 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/apx-ppx-2.c > @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ > +/* { dg-do compile { target { ! ia32 } } } */ > +/* { dg-options "-O1 -mapx-features=ppx -fno-omit-frame-pointer" } */ > + > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "pushp" } } */ > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "popp" } } */ > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "leave" } } */ > + > +extern int bar (int a); > +extern int *q; > + > +void foo (int *a) > +{ > + q[2] = bar (q[1]); > +} > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/apx-ppx-3.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/apx-ppx-3.c > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000000..76931fbe294 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/apx-ppx-3.c > @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ > +/* { dg-do compile { target { ! ia32 } } } */ > +/* { dg-options "-O2 -mapx-features=ppx" } */ > + > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "pushp" } } */ > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "popp" } } */ > + > +#include "eh_return-2.c" > -- > 2.31.1 >
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc b/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc index bd7411190af..99def8d4a77 100644 --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc @@ -7429,6 +7429,7 @@ ix86_emit_save_regs (void) { int regno; rtx_insn *insn; + bool use_ppx = TARGET_APX_PPX && !crtl->calls_eh_return; if (!TARGET_APX_PUSH2POP2 || !ix86_can_use_push2pop2 () @@ -7438,7 +7439,7 @@ ix86_emit_save_regs (void) if (GENERAL_REGNO_P (regno) && ix86_save_reg (regno, true, true)) { insn = emit_insn (gen_push (gen_rtx_REG (word_mode, regno), - TARGET_APX_PPX)); + use_ppx)); RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P (insn) = 1; } } @@ -7469,7 +7470,7 @@ ix86_emit_save_regs (void) regno_list[0]), gen_rtx_REG (word_mode, regno_list[1]), - TARGET_APX_PPX)); + use_ppx)); RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P (insn) = 1; rtx dwarf = gen_rtx_SEQUENCE (VOIDmode, rtvec_alloc (3)); @@ -7502,7 +7503,7 @@ ix86_emit_save_regs (void) else { insn = emit_insn (gen_push (gen_rtx_REG (word_mode, regno), - TARGET_APX_PPX)); + use_ppx)); RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P (insn) = 1; aligned = true; } @@ -7511,7 +7512,7 @@ ix86_emit_save_regs (void) { insn = emit_insn (gen_push (gen_rtx_REG (word_mode, regno_list[0]), - TARGET_APX_PPX)); + use_ppx)); RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P (insn) = 1; } } @@ -8985,6 +8986,7 @@ ix86_expand_prologue (void) if (!frame.save_regs_using_mov) { ix86_emit_save_regs (); + m->fs.apx_ppx_used = TARGET_APX_PPX && !crtl->calls_eh_return; int_registers_saved = true; gcc_assert (m->fs.sp_offset == frame.reg_save_offset); } @@ -9870,6 +9872,9 @@ ix86_expand_epilogue (int style) /* SEH requires the use of pops to identify the epilogue. */ else if (TARGET_SEH) restore_regs_via_mov = false; + /* If we already save reg with pushp, don't use move at epilogue. */ + else if (m->fs.apx_ppx_used) + restore_regs_via_mov = false; /* If we're only restoring one register and sp cannot be used then using a move instruction to restore the register since it's less work than reloading sp and popping the register. */ diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.h b/gcc/config/i386/i386.h index 147b12cd014..0c5292e1d64 100644 --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.h +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.h @@ -2693,6 +2693,10 @@ struct GTY(()) machine_frame_state The flags realigned and sp_realigned are mutually exclusive. */ BOOL_BITFIELD sp_realigned : 1; + /* When APX_PPX used in prologue, force epilogue to emit + popp instead of move and leave. */ + BOOL_BITFIELD apx_ppx_used : 1; + /* If sp_realigned is set, this is the last valid offset from the CFA that can be used for access with the frame pointer. */ HOST_WIDE_INT sp_realigned_fp_last; diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/apx-ppx-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/apx-ppx-2.c new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..42a95340b55 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/apx-ppx-2.c @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +/* { dg-do compile { target { ! ia32 } } } */ +/* { dg-options "-O1 -mapx-features=ppx -fno-omit-frame-pointer" } */ + +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "pushp" } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "popp" } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "leave" } } */ + +extern int bar (int a); +extern int *q; + +void foo (int *a) +{ + q[2] = bar (q[1]); +} diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/apx-ppx-3.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/apx-ppx-3.c new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..76931fbe294 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/apx-ppx-3.c @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +/* { dg-do compile { target { ! ia32 } } } */ +/* { dg-options "-O2 -mapx-features=ppx" } */ + +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "pushp" } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "popp" } } */ + +#include "eh_return-2.c"