Message ID | 20231107114814.851059-1-juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | RISC-V: Add RISC-V into vect_cmdline_needed | expand |
Looks OK but I don't really get the test (e.g. gen-vect-26.c). It is only ran if target vect_cmdline_needed, otherwise compiled? Why does that have an impact on the scan? Looks weird but well... Regards Robin
It need command line to enable SIMD auto-vectorization (VLS mode in RVV).
It will enable VLS modes auto-vectorization by default if we didn't add RISCV into vect_cmdline.
So adding it to disable VLS mode vectorization which will fix the FAILs like other targets.
juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai
From: Robin Dapp
Date: 2023-11-07 20:04
To: Juzhe-Zhong; gcc-patches
CC: rdapp.gcc; kito.cheng; kito.cheng; jeffreyalaw
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Add RISC-V into vect_cmdline_needed
Looks OK but I don't really get the test (e.g. gen-vect-26.c). It is
only ran if target vect_cmdline_needed, otherwise compiled? Why does
that have an impact on the scan? Looks weird but well...
Regards
Robin
> It need command line to enable SIMD auto-vectorization (VLS mode in RVV). > It will enable VLS modes auto-vectorization by default if we didn't add RISCV into vect_cmdline. > So adding it to disable VLS mode vectorization which will fix the FAILs like other targets. Ah so it's about SIMD despite the name, I see. Still weird but adding riscv then makes sense. So OK. The test probably just very old. Regards Robin
Thanks. Committed. juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai From: Robin Dapp Date: 2023-11-07 20:10 To: juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai; gcc-patches CC: rdapp.gcc; kito.cheng; Kito.cheng; jeffreyalaw Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Add RISC-V into vect_cmdline_needed > It need command line to enable SIMD auto-vectorization (VLS mode in RVV). > It will enable VLS modes auto-vectorization by default if we didn't add RISCV into vect_cmdline. > So adding it to disable VLS mode vectorization which will fix the FAILs like other targets. Ah so it's about SIMD despite the name, I see. Still weird but adding riscv then makes sense. So OK. The test probably just very old. Regards Robin
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp index 17a87db0007..285817ef16e 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp +++ b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp @@ -4036,7 +4036,8 @@ proc check_effective_target_vect_cmdline_needed { } { || ([istarget sparc*-*-*] && [check_effective_target_sparc_vis]) || ([istarget arm*-*-*] && [check_effective_target_arm_neon]) || [istarget aarch64*-*-*] - || [istarget amdgcn*-*-*]} { + || [istarget amdgcn*-*-*] + || [istarget riscv*-*-*]} { return 0 } else { return 1