Message ID | 20231102190911.66763-1-patrick@rivosinc.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | gfortran: Rely on dg-do-what-default to avoid running pr85853.f90, pr107254.f90 and vect-alias-check-1.F90 on non-vector targets | expand |
Ping. Testsuite fixup similar to: https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/974e9e5e-8f07-46dd-b9b9-db8aa46859b5@gmail.com/T/#t https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/7e78cd70-70c9-41b1-8a98-6977a103429e@rivosinc.com/T/#t Patrick On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 12:09 PM Patrick O'Neill <patrick@rivosinc.com> wrote: > > Testcases in gfortran.dg/vect/vect.exp rely on > check_vect_support_and_set_flags to set dg-do-what-default and avoid > running vector tests on non-vector targets. The three testcases in this > patch overwrite the default with dg-do run which causes issues > for non-vector targets. > > Removing the dg-do run directive resolves this issue for non-vector > targets (while still running the tests on vector targets). > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > * gfortran.dg/vect/pr107254.f90: Remove dg-do run directive. > * gfortran.dg/vect/pr85853.f90: Ditto. > * gfortran.dg/vect/vect-alias-check-1.F90: Ditto. > > Signed-off-by: Patrick O'Neill <patrick@rivosinc.com> > --- > Tested using rv64gc & rv64gcv to make sure the testcases compile/run > as expected. > > These files haven't been changed in a long time so I'm not sure why (or > if) this hasn't been run into by other people before. > --- > gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/pr107254.f90 | 2 -- > gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/pr85853.f90 | 1 - > gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/vect-alias-check-1.F90 | 1 - > 3 files changed, 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/pr107254.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/pr107254.f90 > index 85bcb5f3fa2..adce6bedc30 100644 > --- a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/pr107254.f90 > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/pr107254.f90 > @@ -1,5 +1,3 @@ > -! { dg-do run } > - > subroutine dlartg( f, g, s, r ) > implicit none > double precision :: f, g, r, s > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/pr85853.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/pr85853.f90 > index 68f4a004324..4c0e3b81a09 100644 > --- a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/pr85853.f90 > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/pr85853.f90 > @@ -1,5 +1,4 @@ > ! Taken from execute/where_2.f90, but with special flags. > -! { dg-do run } > ! { dg-additional-options "-fno-tree-loop-vectorize" } > > ! Program to test the WHERE constructs > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/vect-alias-check-1.F90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/vect-alias-check-1.F90 > index 3014ff9f3b6..85ae9b151e3 100644 > --- a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/vect-alias-check-1.F90 > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/vect-alias-check-1.F90 > @@ -1,4 +1,3 @@ > -! { dg-do run } > ! { dg-additional-options "-fno-inline" } > > #define N 200 > -- > 2.34.1 >
On 11/15/23 17:03, Patrick O'Neill wrote: > Ping. > > Testsuite fixup similar to: > https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/974e9e5e-8f07-46dd-b9b9-db8aa46859b5@gmail.com/T/#t > https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/7e78cd70-70c9-41b1-8a98-6977a103429e@rivosinc.com/T/#t OK. Jeff
On 11/18/23 20:09, Jeff Law wrote: > > > On 11/15/23 17:03, Patrick O'Neill wrote: >> Ping. >> >> Testsuite fixup similar to: >> https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/974e9e5e-8f07-46dd-b9b9-db8aa46859b5@gmail.com/T/#t >> >> https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/7e78cd70-70c9-41b1-8a98-6977a103429e@rivosinc.com/T/#t >> > OK. > > > Jeff Committed. Patrick
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/pr107254.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/pr107254.f90 index 85bcb5f3fa2..adce6bedc30 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/pr107254.f90 +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/pr107254.f90 @@ -1,5 +1,3 @@ -! { dg-do run } - subroutine dlartg( f, g, s, r ) implicit none double precision :: f, g, r, s diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/pr85853.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/pr85853.f90 index 68f4a004324..4c0e3b81a09 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/pr85853.f90 +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/pr85853.f90 @@ -1,5 +1,4 @@ ! Taken from execute/where_2.f90, but with special flags. -! { dg-do run } ! { dg-additional-options "-fno-tree-loop-vectorize" } ! Program to test the WHERE constructs diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/vect-alias-check-1.F90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/vect-alias-check-1.F90 index 3014ff9f3b6..85ae9b151e3 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/vect-alias-check-1.F90 +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/vect-alias-check-1.F90 @@ -1,4 +1,3 @@ -! { dg-do run } ! { dg-additional-options "-fno-inline" } #define N 200
Testcases in gfortran.dg/vect/vect.exp rely on check_vect_support_and_set_flags to set dg-do-what-default and avoid running vector tests on non-vector targets. The three testcases in this patch overwrite the default with dg-do run which causes issues for non-vector targets. Removing the dg-do run directive resolves this issue for non-vector targets (while still running the tests on vector targets). gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gfortran.dg/vect/pr107254.f90: Remove dg-do run directive. * gfortran.dg/vect/pr85853.f90: Ditto. * gfortran.dg/vect/vect-alias-check-1.F90: Ditto. Signed-off-by: Patrick O'Neill <patrick@rivosinc.com> --- Tested using rv64gc & rv64gcv to make sure the testcases compile/run as expected. These files haven't been changed in a long time so I'm not sure why (or if) this hasn't been run into by other people before. --- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/pr107254.f90 | 2 -- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/pr85853.f90 | 1 - gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/vect-alias-check-1.F90 | 1 - 3 files changed, 4 deletions(-)