Message ID | 20231015011648.1608638-2-pinskia@gmail.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [1/2] Fix ICE due to c_safe_arg_type_equiv_p not checking for error_mark node | expand |
On Sat, 14 Oct 2023, Andrew Pinski wrote: > When checking to see if we have a function declaration has a conflict due to > promotations, there is no test to see if the type was an error mark and then calls > c_type_promotes_to. c_type_promotes_to is not ready for error_mark and causes an > ICE. > > This adds a check for error before the call of c_type_promotes_to. > > OK? Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux-gnu with no regressions. OK.
diff --git a/gcc/c/c-decl.cc b/gcc/c/c-decl.cc index 5822faf01b4..eb2df08c0a7 100644 --- a/gcc/c/c-decl.cc +++ b/gcc/c/c-decl.cc @@ -1899,7 +1899,8 @@ diagnose_arglist_conflict (tree newdecl, tree olddecl, break; } - if (c_type_promotes_to (type) != type) + if (!error_operand_p (type) + && c_type_promotes_to (type) != type) { inform (input_location, "an argument type that has a default " "promotion cannot match an empty parameter name list " diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr101364-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr101364-1.c new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e7c94a05553 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr101364-1.c @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-options "-std=c90 "} */ + +void fruit(); /* { dg-message "previous declaration" } */ +void fruit( /* { dg-error "conflicting types for" } */ + int b[x], /* { dg-error "undeclared " } */ + short c) +{} /* { dg-message "an argument type that has a" } */