diff mbox series

[RFA] -Wdangling-pointer: fix MEM_REF handling [PR109514]

Message ID 20230414234224.2870389-1-jason@redhat.com
State New
Headers show
Series [RFA] -Wdangling-pointer: fix MEM_REF handling [PR109514] | expand

Commit Message

Jason Merrill April 14, 2023, 11:42 p.m. UTC 
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?

-- 8< --

Here we hit the MEM_REF case, with its arg an ADDR_EXPR, but had no handling
for that and wrongly assumed it would be a reference to a local variable.
This patch overhauls the logic for deciding whether the target is something
to warn about so that we only warn if we specifically recognize the target
as non-local.  None of the existing tests regress as a result.

	PR c++/109514

gcc/ChangeLog:

	* gimple-ssa-warn-access.cc (pass_waccess::check_dangling_stores):
	Overhaul lhs_ref.ref analysis.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* g++.dg/warn/Wdangling-pointer-6.C: New test.
---
 gcc/gimple-ssa-warn-access.cc                 | 50 ++++++++-----------
 .../g++.dg/warn/Wdangling-pointer-6.C         | 30 +++++++++++
 2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wdangling-pointer-6.C


base-commit: f32f7881fb0db085479525b5a23db5dabd990c3b

Comments

Jeff Law April 15, 2023, 1:22 a.m. UTC | #1 
On 4/14/23 17:42, Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?
> 
> -- 8< --
> 
> Here we hit the MEM_REF case, with its arg an ADDR_EXPR, but had no handling
> for that and wrongly assumed it would be a reference to a local variable.
> This patch overhauls the logic for deciding whether the target is something
> to warn about so that we only warn if we specifically recognize the target
> as non-local.  None of the existing tests regress as a result.
> 
> 	PR c++/109514
> 
> gcc/ChangeLog:
> 
> 	* gimple-ssa-warn-access.cc (pass_waccess::check_dangling_stores):
> 	Overhaul lhs_ref.ref analysis.
> 
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> 
> 	* g++.dg/warn/Wdangling-pointer-6.C: New test.
One might ask if we have a (MEM_REF (ADDR_REF ...)) why we didn't 
simplify that by removing the MEM_REF and ADDR_REF wrappers.   But on 
the assumption there's a good reason to have such nodes, OK for the trunk.

jeff
Jason Merrill April 15, 2023, 1:54 a.m. UTC | #2 
On 4/14/23 21:22, Jeff Law wrote:
> 
> 
> On 4/14/23 17:42, Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?
>>
>> -- 8< --
>>
>> Here we hit the MEM_REF case, with its arg an ADDR_EXPR, but had no 
>> handling
>> for that and wrongly assumed it would be a reference to a local variable.
>> This patch overhauls the logic for deciding whether the target is 
>> something
>> to warn about so that we only warn if we specifically recognize the 
>> target
>> as non-local.  None of the existing tests regress as a result.
>>
>>     PR c++/109514
>>
>> gcc/ChangeLog:
>>
>>     * gimple-ssa-warn-access.cc (pass_waccess::check_dangling_stores):
>>     Overhaul lhs_ref.ref analysis.
>>
>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>>
>>     * g++.dg/warn/Wdangling-pointer-6.C: New test.
> One might ask if we have a (MEM_REF (ADDR_REF ...)) why we didn't 
> simplify that by removing the MEM_REF and ADDR_REF wrappers.

FYI in this case the type of the MEM_REF is the type of a member of a 
member of a member of the variable.

> But on 
> the assumption there's a good reason to have such nodes, OK for the trunk.
> 
> jeff
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/gcc/gimple-ssa-warn-access.cc b/gcc/gimple-ssa-warn-access.cc
index b3de4b77924..d0d2148c872 100644
--- a/gcc/gimple-ssa-warn-access.cc
+++ b/gcc/gimple-ssa-warn-access.cc
@@ -4528,39 +4528,34 @@  pass_waccess::check_dangling_stores (basic_block bb,
       if (!m_ptr_qry.get_ref (lhs, stmt, &lhs_ref, 0))
 	continue;
 
-      if (auto_var_p (lhs_ref.ref))
-	continue;
-
-      if (DECL_P (lhs_ref.ref))
+      if (TREE_CODE (lhs_ref.ref) == MEM_REF)
 	{
-	  if (!POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (lhs_ref.ref))
-	      || lhs_ref.deref > 0)
-	    continue;
+	  lhs_ref.ref = TREE_OPERAND (lhs_ref.ref, 0);
+	  ++lhs_ref.deref;
 	}
-      else if (TREE_CODE (lhs_ref.ref) == SSA_NAME)
+      if (TREE_CODE (lhs_ref.ref) == ADDR_EXPR)
+	{
+	  lhs_ref.ref = TREE_OPERAND (lhs_ref.ref, 0);
+	  --lhs_ref.deref;
+	}
+      if (TREE_CODE (lhs_ref.ref) == SSA_NAME)
 	{
 	  gimple *def_stmt = SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (lhs_ref.ref);
 	  if (!gimple_nop_p (def_stmt))
 	    /* Avoid looking at or before stores into unknown objects.  */
 	    return;
 
-	  tree var = SSA_NAME_VAR (lhs_ref.ref);
-	  if (TREE_CODE (var) == PARM_DECL && DECL_BY_REFERENCE (var))
-	    /* Avoid by-value arguments transformed into by-reference.  */
-	    continue;
+	  lhs_ref.ref = SSA_NAME_VAR (lhs_ref.ref);
+	}
 
-	}
-      else if (TREE_CODE (lhs_ref.ref) == MEM_REF)
-	{
-	  tree arg = TREE_OPERAND (lhs_ref.ref, 0);
-	  if (TREE_CODE (arg) == SSA_NAME)
-	    {
-	      gimple *def_stmt = SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (arg);
-	      if (!gimple_nop_p (def_stmt))
-		return;
-	    }
-	}
+      if (TREE_CODE (lhs_ref.ref) == PARM_DECL
+	  && (lhs_ref.deref - DECL_BY_REFERENCE (lhs_ref.ref)) > 0)
+	/* Assignment through a (real) pointer/reference parameter.  */;
+      else if (TREE_CODE (lhs_ref.ref) == VAR_DECL
+	       && !auto_var_p (lhs_ref.ref))
+	/* Assignment to/through a non-local variable.  */;
       else
+	/* Something else, don't warn.  */
 	continue;
 
       if (stores.add (lhs_ref.ref))
@@ -4587,13 +4582,8 @@  pass_waccess::check_dangling_stores (basic_block bb,
 	  location_t loc = DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (rhs_ref.ref);
 	  inform (loc, "%qD declared here", rhs_ref.ref);
 
-	  if (DECL_P (lhs_ref.ref))
-	    loc = DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (lhs_ref.ref);
-	  else if (EXPR_HAS_LOCATION (lhs_ref.ref))
-	    loc = EXPR_LOCATION (lhs_ref.ref);
-
-	  if (loc != UNKNOWN_LOCATION)
-	    inform (loc, "%qE declared here", lhs_ref.ref);
+	  loc = DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (lhs_ref.ref);
+	  inform (loc, "%qD declared here", lhs_ref.ref);
 	}
     }
 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wdangling-pointer-6.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wdangling-pointer-6.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..20d47edecc5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wdangling-pointer-6.C
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ 
+// PR c++/109514
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+// { dg-additional-options "-O2 -Werror=dangling-pointer" }
+
+struct _Rb_tree_node_base {
+  _Rb_tree_node_base *_M_parent;
+};
+struct _Rb_tree_header {
+  _Rb_tree_node_base _M_header;
+  void _M_move_data() { _M_header._M_parent->_M_parent = &_M_header; }
+};
+struct _Rb_tree {
+  _Rb_tree_header _M_impl;
+  _Rb_tree_node_base *&_M_root() { return _M_impl._M_header._M_parent; }
+  _Rb_tree();
+  _Rb_tree &operator=(_Rb_tree &&);
+};
+_Rb_tree &_Rb_tree::operator=(_Rb_tree &&) {
+  if (_M_root())
+    _M_impl._M_move_data();
+  return *this;
+}
+struct set {
+  _Rb_tree _M_t;
+};
+set FilterRs();
+void f() {
+  set rs;
+  rs = FilterRs();
+};