Message ID | 20210517161743.870382-1-ppalka@redhat.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | libstdc++: Fix condition for memoizing reverse_view::begin() [PR100621] | expand |
On 17/05/21 12:17 -0400, Patrick Palka via Libstdc++ wrote: >A range being a random access range is not a sufficient condition for >ranges::next(iter, sent) to have constant time complexity; the range >must also have a sized sentinel. This adjusts the memoization condition >for reverse_view accordingly. > >Tested on x86_64-pc-linxu-gnu, does this look OK for trunk? Doesn't >seem to be worth backporting. OK for trunk. I agree the backports probably aren't needed, but if it causes anybody problems we can do it later. >libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog: > > * include/std/ranges (reverse_view::_S_needs_cached_begin): > Set to false if the underlying non-common random-access range > doesn't have a sized sentinel. >--- > libstdc++-v3/include/std/ranges | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/ranges b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/ranges >index bf52074ca05..e93469ca3b4 100644 >--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/ranges >+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/ranges >@@ -3340,7 +3340,9 @@ namespace views::__adaptor > { > private: > static constexpr bool _S_needs_cached_begin >- = !common_range<_Vp> && !random_access_range<_Vp>; >+ = !common_range<_Vp> && !(random_access_range<_Vp> >+ && sized_sentinel_for<sentinel_t<_Vp>, >+ iterator_t<_Vp>>); > > [[no_unique_address]] > __detail::__maybe_present_t<_S_needs_cached_begin, >-- >2.31.1.621.g97eea85a0a >
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/ranges b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/ranges index bf52074ca05..e93469ca3b4 100644 --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/ranges +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/ranges @@ -3340,7 +3340,9 @@ namespace views::__adaptor { private: static constexpr bool _S_needs_cached_begin - = !common_range<_Vp> && !random_access_range<_Vp>; + = !common_range<_Vp> && !(random_access_range<_Vp> + && sized_sentinel_for<sentinel_t<_Vp>, + iterator_t<_Vp>>); [[no_unique_address]] __detail::__maybe_present_t<_S_needs_cached_begin,