From patchwork Mon Feb 6 14:43:45 2017 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Dominik Vogt X-Patchwork-Id: 724532 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3vH9JB6S5Rz9s2G for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 01:45:46 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gcc.gnu.org header.i=@gcc.gnu.org header.b="b1BiyWPx"; dkim-atps=neutral DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-archive:list-post:list-help:sender:date :from:to:cc:subject:reply-to:mime-version:content-type :message-id; q=dns; s=default; b=k1eD5t0fu80j7empKnLhmHIr/t2NgbS DF1VEBxQBSkSzvCgI30ZSJHWVV4zEZCu9SIHLIF16GMs41J/dhGCm9kZR7pAGTUg 6883PS2oi1AOu4ldpKZHVXgygyzp6duVJYEJnEQgzh/Xj50YTiWWg1+jsKhMak+/ glOw7mz98RfM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-archive:list-post:list-help:sender:date :from:to:cc:subject:reply-to:mime-version:content-type :message-id; s=default; bh=gtPkk1Zn9jUBNTj+O7k2dWhpnUg=; b=b1Biy WPxRTqMbDtYmQkT6TaLXUFLvIJgBOyFSrUAPkT7ZspOFjft9j1wMWsWs/HzQO9oQ j12PfO1LyTFU4dTm2HEGfl1qypAHwlPu1QjjrP5G+8Oumj45W5MmfRCTbeVIdXIa zIoD30+TGIcAWBKYeMy4txdv96qXq/jEKLrzro= Received: (qmail 85437 invoked by alias); 6 Feb 2017 14:45:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 85265 invoked by uid 89); 6 Feb 2017 14:45:31 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=ciao, biarch, sk:changel, unrolling X-HELO: mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (HELO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com) (148.163.156.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Feb 2017 14:45:20 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098410.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.20/8.16.0.20) with SMTP id v16Ehjlq097867 for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 09:45:19 -0500 Received: from e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.111]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 28dccd9c3y-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 06 Feb 2017 09:45:18 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 14:43:46 -0000 Received: from d06dlp02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.20.14) by e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.145) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 14:43:43 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay10.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.195]) by d06dlp02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D73552190056 for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 14:42:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.232]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id v16EhgPl19988792; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 14:43:42 GMT Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 590E652045; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 13:42:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from oc5510024614.ibm.com (unknown [9.145.31.65]) by d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D46952047; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 13:42:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: by oc5510024614.ibm.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 429661AA1D; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 15:43:46 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 15:43:45 +0100 From: Dominik Vogt To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Andreas Krebbel Subject: [PATCH] PR 78348: Limit amount of unrolling in test. Reply-To: vogt@linux.vnet.ibm.com Mail-Followup-To: vogt@linux.vnet.ibm.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Andreas Krebbel MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 17020614-0020-0000-0000-000003011F99 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 17020614-0021-0000-0000-0000404B4D3E Message-Id: <20170206144345.GA25000@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-02-06_05:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=1 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1612050000 definitions=main-1702060146 The attached patch fixes the s390x test failure reported here: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78348 Tested on s390x biarch. Ciao Dominik ^_^ ^_^ diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ldist-24.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ldist-24.c index 7ab79e6..75f7b8f 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ldist-24.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ldist-24.c @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ /* { dg-do compile } */ -/* { dg-options "-O3 -fdump-tree-ldist-details" } */ +/* { dg-options "-O3 -fdump-tree-ldist-details --param max-completely-peel-times=8" } */ typedef struct S { double z[8][25];