@@ -2926,24 +2926,29 @@ struct equivalence
structure for that register. */
static struct equivalence *reg_equiv;
-/* Used for communication between the following two functions: contains
- a MEM that we wish to ensure remains unchanged. */
-static rtx equiv_mem;
+/* Used for communication between the following two functions. */
+struct equiv_mem_data
+{
+ /* A MEM that we wish to ensure remains unchanged. */
+ rtx equiv_mem;
-/* Set nonzero if EQUIV_MEM is modified. */
-static int equiv_mem_modified;
+ /* Set true if EQUIV_MEM is modified. */
+ bool equiv_mem_modified;
+};
/* If EQUIV_MEM is modified by modifying DEST, indicate that it is modified.
Called via note_stores. */
static void
validate_equiv_mem_from_store (rtx dest, const_rtx set ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
- void *data ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
+ void *data)
{
+ struct equiv_mem_data *info = (struct equiv_mem_data *) data;
+
if ((REG_P (dest)
- && reg_overlap_mentioned_p (dest, equiv_mem))
+ && reg_overlap_mentioned_p (dest, info->equiv_mem))
|| (MEM_P (dest)
- && anti_dependence (equiv_mem, dest)))
- equiv_mem_modified = 1;
+ && anti_dependence (info->equiv_mem, dest)))
+ info->equiv_mem_modified = true;
}
/* Verify that no store between START and the death of REG invalidates
@@ -2957,16 +2962,14 @@ validate_equiv_mem (rtx_insn *start, rtx reg, rtx memref)
{
rtx_insn *insn;
rtx note;
-
- equiv_mem = memref;
- equiv_mem_modified = 0;
+ struct equiv_mem_data info = { memref, false };
/* If the memory reference has side effects or is volatile, it isn't a
valid equivalence. */
if (side_effects_p (memref))
return 0;
- for (insn = start; insn && ! equiv_mem_modified; insn = NEXT_INSN (insn))
+ for (insn = start; insn; insn = NEXT_INSN (insn))
{
if (! INSN_P (insn))
continue;
@@ -2982,7 +2985,9 @@ validate_equiv_mem (rtx_insn *start, rtx reg, rtx memref)
if (CALL_P (insn))
return 0;
- note_stores (PATTERN (insn), validate_equiv_mem_from_store, NULL);
+ note_stores (PATTERN (insn), validate_equiv_mem_from_store, &info);
+ if (info.equiv_mem_modified)
+ return 0;
/* If a register mentioned in MEMREF is modified via an
auto-increment, we lose the equivalence. Do the same if one