From patchwork Wed Jan 27 09:39:44 2016 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Dominik Vogt X-Patchwork-Id: 573894 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B0521402B4 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2016 20:40:05 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gcc.gnu.org header.i=@gcc.gnu.org header.b=ZWmsum6H; dkim-atps=neutral DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-archive:list-post:list-help:sender:date :from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=iYwAz2Tv+l1Ik8crRjrr7sElCN0vLC92mAwoxrLObdx YngY94N33hE/QYOwAP5Hvi95DelxOQn8uy3vzVwTAZGcP+y2MkYBgrzxAjDzCHEs 7IsTLDpqUaadUsi460U9PtDoK3KCh2Mzx1Mgr8GZjPXVvZh0u+zDH66pJJCZ6GfQ = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-archive:list-post:list-help:sender:date :from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to:mime-version:content-type; s=default; bh=OOQPvwOyDaEWwLcwRV7MqCrI6o4=; b=ZWmsum6Hkmo4ZoJ0b Jt8VdBdX++/9IGrPKu7RsFfzMlyIjRrUrugFFxocR1EdBy9Qtqz+Z5pK+b3D9A90 ux8Ne8Hp7iVCWUIA623oMcwvILIRI6rK9+n4ByWrNeMVwdbx9jaofX+LJkO/1pUC QTTf8HeNT/pCPi8BZE4GAHGDPo= Received: (qmail 18794 invoked by alias); 27 Jan 2016 09:39:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 18782 invoked by uid 89); 27 Jan 2016 09:39:55 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=2, 6, 2, 7, sk:have___, sk:HAVE___ X-HELO: e06smtp11.uk.ibm.com Received: from e06smtp11.uk.ibm.com (HELO e06smtp11.uk.ibm.com) (195.75.94.107) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (CAMELLIA256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 27 Jan 2016 09:39:54 +0000 Received: from localhost by e06smtp11.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 27 Jan 2016 09:39:50 -0000 Received: from d06dlp01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.20.13) by e06smtp11.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.141) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Wed, 27 Jan 2016 09:39:46 -0000 X-IBM-Helo: d06dlp01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com X-IBM-MailFrom: vogt@linux.vnet.ibm.com X-IBM-RcptTo: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay12.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.197]) by d06dlp01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97DE217D806B for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2016 09:39:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av06.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av06.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.217]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id u0R9djxL52560108 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2016 09:39:46 GMT Received: from d06av06.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d06av06.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id u0R9djvC028410 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2016 04:39:45 -0500 Received: from bl3ahm9f.de.ibm.com (dyn-9-152-212-53.boeblingen.de.ibm.com [9.152.212.53]) by d06av06.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id u0R9djZf028386 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2016 04:39:45 -0500 Received: from dvogt by bl3ahm9f.de.ibm.com with local (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1aOMZk-0007jJ-KU; Wed, 27 Jan 2016 10:39:44 +0100 Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 10:39:44 +0100 From: Dominik Vogt To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [PATCH] Remove xfail from thread_local-order2.C. Message-ID: <20160127093944.GA28942@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: vogt@linux.vnet.ibm.com Mail-Followup-To: vogt@linux.vnet.ibm.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 16012709-0041-0000-0000-0000074CE559 g++.dg/tls/thread_local-order2.C no longer fail with Glibc-2.18 or newer since this commit: 2014-08-01 Zifei Tong * libsupc++/atexit_thread.cc (HAVE___CXA_THREAD_ATEXIT_IMPL): Add _GLIBCXX_ prefix to macro. git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@213504 138bc75d-0d04-0410-96 https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-07/msg02091.html So, is it time to remove the xfail from the test case? Ciao Dominik ^_^ ^_^ From 0b0abbd2e6d9d8b6857622065bdcbdde31b5ddb0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dominik Vogt Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 09:54:07 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Remove xfail from thread_local-order2.C. This should work with Glibc-2.18 or newer. --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tls/thread_local-order2.C | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tls/thread_local-order2.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tls/thread_local-order2.C index f8df917..d3351e6 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tls/thread_local-order2.C +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tls/thread_local-order2.C @@ -2,7 +2,6 @@ // that isn't reverse order of construction. We need to move // __cxa_thread_atexit into glibc to get this right. -// { dg-do run { xfail *-*-* } } // { dg-require-effective-target c++11 } // { dg-add-options tls } // { dg-require-effective-target tls_runtime } -- 2.3.0