Mention avx2 patch

Hi,

This patch removes ix86/avx branch and mentions avx2 branch.  OK
to install?


H.J.
----

Ping

--
Thanks, K

On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 4:43 PM, H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch removes ix86/avx branch and mentions avx2 branch.  OK
> to install?
>
>
> H.J.
> ----
> Index: svn.html
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/svn.html,v
> retrieving revision 1.162
> diff -u -p -r1.162 svn.html
> --- svn.html    3 Jun 2011 14:04:32 -0000       1.162
> +++ svn.html    20 Jun 2011 12:41:27 -0000
> @@ -353,13 +353,12 @@ the command <code>svn log --stop-on-copy
>   and Erven Rohou
>   &lt;<a href="mailto:erven.rohou@st.com">erven.rohou@st.com</a>&gt;.</dd>
>
> -  <dt>ix86/avx</dt>
> -  <dd>The goal of this branch is to implement Intel AVX (Intel Advanced
> -  Vector Extensions).  The branch is maintained by
> -  H.J. Lu &lt;<a href="mailto:hjl.tools@gmail.com">hjl.tools@gmail.com</a>&gt;,
> -  Joey Ye &lt;<a href="mailto:joey.ye@intel.com">joey.ye@intel.com</a>&gt;
> -  and Xuepeng Guo &lt;<a href="mailto:xuepeng.guo@intel.com">xuepeng.guo@intel.com</a>&gt;.
> -  Patches should be marked with the tag <code>[AVX]</code> in the subject
> +  <dt>avx2</dt>
> +  <dd>The goal of this branch is to implement AVX Programming Reference
> +  (June, 2011). The branch is maintained by
> +  H.J. Lu &lt;<a href="mailto:hjl.tools@gmail.com">hjl.tools@gmail.com</a>&gt;
> +  and Yukhin Kirill &lt;<a href="mailto:kirill.yukhin@intel.com">kirill.yukhin@intel.com</a>&gt;.
> +  Patches should be marked with the tag <code>[AVX2]</code> in the subject
>   line.</dd>
>
>   <dt>ix86/gcc-4_5-branch</dt>
>

On Thu, 28 Jul 2011, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> Ping

Oh, sure.  I had somehow thought this had been applied already.

Instead of just removing ix86/avx, would you mind moving it to
the "Inactive Development Branches" section?

Gerald

Agreed, but I have no idea, how to work with wwwdocs at all.

H.J., could you please move ix86/avx to "inactive" section?

Thanks, K

On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
>> Ping
>
> Oh, sure.  I had somehow thought this had been applied already.
>
> Instead of just removing ix86/avx, would you mind moving it to
> the "Inactive Development Branches" section?
>
> Gerald
>