different manner.) Given the constraints of the function_args_iterator
interface, I thought rewriting the logic of the loop would make things
slightly clearer.
Tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu with ObjC/C++. OK to commit?
-Nathan
gcc/objc/
* objc-act.c (objc_compare_types): Use function_args_iterator
instead of TYPE_ARG_TYPES to compare function argument types.
@@ -2420,6 +2420,8 @@ objc_compare_types (tree ltyp, tree rtyp, int argno, tree callee)
lenient than C or C++ on this. */
if (TREE_CODE (ltyp) == FUNCTION_TYPE && TREE_CODE (rtyp) == FUNCTION_TYPE)
{
+ function_args_iterator liter, riter;
+
/* Return types must be covariant. */
if (!comptypes (TREE_TYPE (ltyp), TREE_TYPE (rtyp))
&& !objc_compare_types (TREE_TYPE (ltyp), TREE_TYPE (rtyp),
@@ -2427,16 +2429,31 @@ objc_compare_types (tree ltyp, tree rtyp, int argno, tree callee)
return false;
/* Argument types must be contravariant. */
- for (ltyp = TYPE_ARG_TYPES (ltyp), rtyp = TYPE_ARG_TYPES (rtyp);
- ltyp && rtyp; ltyp = TREE_CHAIN (ltyp), rtyp = TREE_CHAIN (rtyp))
+ function_args_iter_init (&liter, ltyp);
+ function_args_iter_init (&riter, rtyp);
+
+ while (1)
{
- if (!comptypes (TREE_VALUE (rtyp), TREE_VALUE (ltyp))
- && !objc_compare_types (TREE_VALUE (rtyp), TREE_VALUE (ltyp),
- argno, callee))
+ ltyp = function_args_iter_cond (&liter);
+ rtyp = function_args_iter_cond (&riter);
+
+ /* If we've exhaused both lists simulateously, we're done. */
+ if (ltyp == NULL_TREE && rtyp == NULL_TREE)
+ break;
+
+ /* If one list is shorter than the other, they fail to match. */
+ if (ltyp == NULL_TREE || rtyp == NULL_TREE)
return false;
- }
- return (ltyp == rtyp);
+ if (!comptypes (rtyp, ltyp)
+ && !objc_compare_types (rtyp, ltyp, argno, callee))
+ return false;
+
+ function_args_iter_next (&liter);
+ function_args_iter_next (&riter);
+ }
+
+ return true;
}
/* Past this point, we are only interested in ObjC class instances,