===================================================================
@@ -10476,12 +10476,16 @@
(const_string "single") (const_string "double")))
(set_attr "type" "jump_ind")])
+;; sibcall_value_pcrel used to have a =&k clobber for the scratch register
+;; that it needs for the branch address. This causes troubles when there
+;; is a big overlap of argument and return value registers. Hence, use a
+;; fixed call clobbered register for the address. See also PR 67260.
(define_insn_and_split "sibcall_value_pcrel"
[(set (match_operand 0 "" "=rf")
(call (mem:SI (match_operand:SI 1 "symbol_ref_operand" ""))
(match_operand 2 "" "")))
(use (reg:SI FPSCR_MODES_REG))
- (clobber (match_scratch:SI 3 "=&k"))
+ (clobber (reg:SI R1_REG))
(return)]
"TARGET_SH2 && !TARGET_FDPIC"
"#"
@@ -10491,6 +10495,8 @@
rtx lab = PATTERN (gen_call_site ());
rtx call_insn;
+ operands[3] = gen_rtx_REG (SImode, R1_REG);
+
sh_expand_sym_label2reg (operands[3], operands[1], lab, true);
call_insn = emit_call_insn (gen_sibcall_valuei_pcrel (operands[0],
operands[3],
@@ -10505,6 +10511,8 @@
(const_string "single") (const_string "double")))
(set_attr "type" "jump_ind")])
+;; Like for sibcall_value_pcrel, use a fixed call clobbered register for
+;; the branch address.
(define_insn_and_split "sibcall_value_pcrel_fdpic"
[(set (match_operand 0 "" "=rf")
(call (mem:SI (match_operand:SI 1 "symbol_ref_operand"))
@@ -10511,7 +10519,7 @@
(match_operand 2)))
(use (reg:SI FPSCR_MODES_REG))
(use (reg:SI PIC_REG))
- (clobber (match_scratch:SI 3 "=k"))
+ (clobber (reg:SI R1_REG))
(return)]
"TARGET_SH2 && TARGET_FDPIC"
"#"
@@ -10520,6 +10528,8 @@
{
rtx lab = PATTERN (gen_call_site ());
+ operands[3] = gen_rtx_REG (SImode, R1_REG);
+
sh_expand_sym_label2reg (operands[3], operands[1], lab, true);
rtx i = emit_call_insn (gen_sibcall_valuei_pcrel_fdpic (operands[0],
operands[3],
===================================================================
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+/* { dg-additional-options "-std=gnu99 -fPIC" } */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+
+#pragma GCC visibility push(hidden)
+
+double _Complex foo (double _Complex arg);
+
+double _Complex
+bar (double _Complex arg)
+{
+ return foo (arg);
+}
Hi, The attached patch(es) fix PR 67260. For details please see the discussion in the PR log. Tested on trunk and sh-elf with make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=sh-sim\{-m2/-ml,-m2/-mb, -m2a/-mb,-m4/-ml,-m4/-mb,-m4a/-ml,-m4a/-mb}" and on GCC 5 and GCC 4.9 branch with make all-gcc and compiling the testcase. Committed to trunk as r233399 + r233400, to GCC 5 branch as r233401 and to GCC 4.9 branch as r233402. Cheers, Oleg