From patchwork Tue Jan 26 21:46:43 2016 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Bill Schmidt X-Patchwork-Id: 573503 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE3C8140BD6 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2016 08:47:08 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gcc.gnu.org header.i=@gcc.gnu.org header.b=ZuEANQ3J; dkim-atps=neutral DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-archive:list-post:list-help:sender :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:content-type:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=O6nCUc+Qrel5Z5HJ LMOdGeckbovTewN8JgsP5kKYpsbWTl7D/uy3dZnbTwdlpAvSCljd74UKWSls7oHQ ya+reFaY1/XiaFwJ+HMxATi2cvqhgn2gDvCcvkRTEWhMEntntyZzDrW/93QFBpiJ SCn6oLOxX/Y82HpZY2y4W1+cSCA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-archive:list-post:list-help:sender :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:content-type:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=DH11C7H2lZGJadBCjEC7N6 xpo/w=; b=ZuEANQ3J2QNIIB13dtKXoUnBeKTWnMb+eAexmET0Uxf7BMs0YIMNX8 eJgojcMGJ258NUgte9Ezsd3GoEwLRZEUppB/rW68avbF5YEnrhe7AvUdITly5kzj cqu3Wky7FA541uiMSj3wbGevDzY5XA82/Q9mokHX2p3Yr6IT7TQY4= Received: (qmail 115596 invoked by alias); 26 Jan 2016 21:47:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 115579 invoked by uid 89); 26 Jan 2016 21:47:00 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:1182 X-HELO: e32.co.us.ibm.com Received: from e32.co.us.ibm.com (HELO e32.co.us.ibm.com) (32.97.110.150) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (CAMELLIA256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 21:46:59 +0000 Received: from localhost by e32.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 14:46:57 -0700 Received: from d03dlp03.boulder.ibm.com (9.17.202.179) by e32.co.us.ibm.com (192.168.1.132) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 14:46:46 -0700 X-IBM-Helo: d03dlp03.boulder.ibm.com X-IBM-MailFrom: wschmidt@linux.vnet.ibm.com X-IBM-RcptTo: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Received: from b03cxnp07028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp07028.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.15]) by d03dlp03.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E944919D803E for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 14:34:45 -0700 (MST) Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (d03av02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.168]) by b03cxnp07028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id u0QLkjjr28115116 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 14:46:45 -0700 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id u0QLkj6k004827 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 14:46:45 -0700 Received: from [9.77.150.179] (sig-9-77-150-179.ibm.com [9.77.150.179]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id u0QLkhsY004703; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 14:46:44 -0700 Message-ID: <1453844803.31883.3.camel@gnopaine> Subject: [PATCH, 4.9, rs6000, testsuite] Fix PR69479 From: Bill Schmidt To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: dje.gcc@gmail.com Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 15:46:43 -0600 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 16012621-0005-0000-0000-00001BCBBA8B X-IsSubscribed: yes Hi, https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69479 notes that gcc.dg/and-1.c fails a scan-assembler-not test for nand, but the test does pass in subsequent releases. The test author indicates in comment #1 that we can just remove this test for powerpc*-*-*, which this patch does. Verified for 4.9 on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu. Ok to commit to that branch? Thanks, Bill 2016-01-26 Bill Schmidt * gcc.dg/and-1.c: Remove nand test for powerpc*-*-*. Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/and-1.c =================================================================== --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/and-1.c (revision 232844) +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/and-1.c (working copy) @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ /* { dg-do compile } */ /* { dg-options "-O2" } */ /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "and" { target powerpc*-*-* spu-*-* } } } */ -/* There should be no nand for this testcase (for either PPC or SPU). */ -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "nand" { target powerpc*-*-* spu-*-* } } } */ +/* There should be no nand for this testcase for SPU. */ +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "nand" { target spu-*-* } } } */ int f(int y) {