From patchwork Tue Apr 7 02:31:28 2015 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Bill Schmidt X-Patchwork-Id: 458579 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6DF7140142 for ; Tue, 7 Apr 2015 12:31:49 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=pass reason="1024-bit key; unprotected key" header.d=gcc.gnu.org header.i=@gcc.gnu.org header.b=ngUa1Ljc; dkim-adsp=none (unprotected policy); dkim-atps=neutral DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-archive:list-post:list-help:sender :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:content-type:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=b9oY4JPkPO+lO4qO dNVT1gizgmtqvLyBwVlBdiIscT+I5fhp6iksCWv2egZGntRE7oDsUZLe4d8ekavS Aq0Eaa5bes0F6sqtySn+diiI7zpdsXrkOnlY8COiUeYtHSbAvtCPMe+D3j4szrvX LrbOUQukKBzrZ7UB1W0RCTYkSyM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-archive:list-post:list-help:sender :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:content-type:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=OEhWSYRk6qr9qESVwc/XO5 fh2RA=; b=ngUa1Ljc9U5vpki7vN1on8lmqBK2q0OTQABc/JDkNHPhjF3ZQG6kZT ttFQM4ujZsUPDlOaYx1uuDTmIkX/cXGrdIarYyeGsscKNb7YD7aaP8KFcen/o/q2 q9ok0qQieXRJyzzI6fqKjdrORp1BTuhQLk/02ktLIe0fTZ2F0wDe0= Received: (qmail 61382 invoked by alias); 7 Apr 2015 02:31:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 61365 invoked by uid 89); 7 Apr 2015 02:31:38 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: e7.ny.us.ibm.com Received: from e7.ny.us.ibm.com (HELO e7.ny.us.ibm.com) (32.97.182.137) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 07 Apr 2015 02:31:34 +0000 Received: from /spool/local by e7.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 6 Apr 2015 22:31:31 -0400 Received: from d01dlp02.pok.ibm.com (9.56.250.167) by e7.ny.us.ibm.com (192.168.1.107) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Mon, 6 Apr 2015 22:31:27 -0400 Received: from b01cxnp22036.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp22036.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.26]) by d01dlp02.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C64A56E804F for ; Mon, 6 Apr 2015 22:23:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (d01av02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.216]) by b01cxnp22036.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id t372VRfJ27263134 for ; Tue, 7 Apr 2015 02:31:27 GMT Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d01av02.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id t372VP0s008630 for ; Mon, 6 Apr 2015 22:31:25 -0400 Received: from [9.50.20.41] ([9.50.20.41]) by d01av02.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id t372VPH0008565; Mon, 6 Apr 2015 22:31:25 -0400 Message-ID: <1428373888.2816.53.camel@gnopaine> Subject: [PATCH, rs6000, libstdc++] Add baseline_symbols.txt for powerpc64le-linux-gnu From: Bill Schmidt To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: dje.gcc@gmail.com, jwakely@redhat.com Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2015 21:31:28 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 15040702-0037-0000-0000-000000F7A4B5 X-IsSubscribed: yes Hi, It was recently pointed out that we still don't have a separate baseline_symbols.txt for powerpc64le-linux-gnu. This patch modifies configure.host to create a new abi_baseline_pair for powerpc64le and provides the generated symbol file (from "make new-abi-baseline"). Is this ok for stage4, or should I hold it until after 5.1 branches? (Apologies for attempting to send the whole file -- didn't see how large it was...) Thanks, Bill 2015-04-06 Bill Schmidt * config/abi/post/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt: New baseline symbols file. * configure.host: Add separate case for powerpc64le. Index: libstdc++-v3/config/abi/post/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt =================================================================== --- libstdc++-v3/config/abi/post/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt (revision 0) +++ libstdc++-v3/config/abi/post/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt (working copy) @@ -0,0 +1,5595 @@ ...too long to post... Index: libstdc++-v3/configure.host =================================================================== --- libstdc++-v3/configure.host (revision 221884) +++ libstdc++-v3/configure.host (working copy) @@ -338,9 +338,12 @@ case "${host}" in mips64*) abi_baseline_pair=mips64-linux-gnu ;; - powerpc64*) + powerpc64) abi_baseline_pair=powerpc64-linux-gnu ;; + powerpc64le) + abi_baseline_pair=powerpc64le-linux-gnu + ;; s390) abi_baseline_pair=s390-linux-gnu ;;