commit 57090307da6ff4378c84f768e2f2717095f712c1
Author: Andrew MacLeod <amacleod@redhat.com>
Date: Mon Apr 26 17:50:18 2021 -0400
Don't over-allocate switch default range object.
We were always allocating the 255 max ranges for the default condition.
Instead, use int_range_max to build the default range, then allocate and
store only what is needed.
* gimple-range-edge.cc (outgoing_range::calc_switch_ranges): Compute
default range into a temp and allocate only what is needed.
@@ -112,8 +112,7 @@ outgoing_range::calc_switch_ranges (gswitch *sw)
//
// Allocate an int_range_max for the default range case, start with
// varying and intersect each other case from it.
- irange *default_range = m_range_allocator.allocate (255);
- default_range->set_varying (type);
+ int_range_max default_range (type);
for (x = 1; x < lim; x++)
{
@@ -132,7 +131,7 @@ outgoing_range::calc_switch_ranges (gswitch *sw)
int_range_max def_range (low, high);
range_cast (def_range, type);
def_range.invert ();
- default_range->intersect (def_range);
+ default_range.intersect (def_range);
// Create/union this case with anything on else on the edge.
int_range_max case_range (low, high);
@@ -156,7 +155,8 @@ outgoing_range::calc_switch_ranges (gswitch *sw)
irange *&slot = m_edge_table->get_or_insert (default_edge, &existed);
// This should be the first call into this switch.
gcc_checking_assert (!existed);
- slot = default_range;
+ irange *dr = m_range_allocator.allocate (default_range);
+ slot = dr;
}