Message ID | cover.1729893964.git.sam@gentoo.org |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Move some single-file LTO tests to torture | expand |
Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> writes: > Andrew pointed this out when committing those testsuite fixes earlier. We > may as well make these proper torture tests rather than having them > unnecessarily in the special lto/ dir which is meant for multiple files > really. > > Sam James (3): > testsuite: move single-file LTO pr62026 test to torture > testsuite: move single-file LTO pr95677 test to torture > testsuite: move single-file LTO pr47333 test to torture > Do these look OK? I've dropped the pr62026 change locally because -r doesn't play well with torture. I think it's borderline obvious but it's somewhat opinionated so I'd like someone to ack it. Thanks. > gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/{lto/pr47333_0.C => torture/pr47333.C} | 3 +-- > gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/{lto/pr62026_0.C => torture/pr62026.C} | 4 ++-- > gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/{lto/pr95677_0.C => torture/pr95677.C} | 6 +----- > 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > rename gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/{lto/pr47333_0.C => torture/pr47333.C} (99%) > rename gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/{lto/pr62026_0.C => torture/pr62026.C} (75%) > rename gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/{lto/pr95677_0.C => torture/pr95677.C} (71%)
On Oct 31, 2024, at 1:56 PM, Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> wrote: > > Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> writes: > >> Andrew pointed this out when committing those testsuite fixes earlier. We >> may as well make these proper torture tests rather than having them >> unnecessarily in the special lto/ dir which is meant for multiple files >> really. >> >> Sam James (3): >> testsuite: move single-file LTO pr62026 test to torture >> testsuite: move single-file LTO pr95677 test to torture >> testsuite: move single-file LTO pr47333 test to torture >> > > Do these look OK? Ok.