From patchwork Wed Apr 11 13:51:30 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Maciej W. Rozycki" X-Patchwork-Id: 897189 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=gcc.gnu.org (client-ip=209.132.180.131; helo=sourceware.org; envelope-from=gcc-patches-return-476213-incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=mips.com Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gcc.gnu.org header.i=@gcc.gnu.org header.b="s7aAGun3"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40LlqM5NLFz9s1j for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 23:53:01 +1000 (AEST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-archive:list-post:list-help:sender:date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=bVXdu2P+owEYXSy/ws7t7U3H/MDH9VeMAP7VpQJjOXiLozT+i3 TTkslZ4/JSmdSrCTFZj5NnZUWllzB0j+qElgjaYVPYS8HK8QNrA34KWsJ5RUWDjW 0SgMzwt/TJvUUWkDmvNS78hYezLM9L72NFhSeqE7bAceczG7M8y7jzv5s= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-archive:list-post:list-help:sender:date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s= default; bh=mUH5M0WXoU/YKDfifLlmMeB3OaM=; b=s7aAGun39CqGm9XQjnHj DHc0lnxYJAUSo0wUfoF4BRnMWyGdTSyJ6ISRJnHVTaeHqWCNqVWscmYDPwfosH+s xPEk4BVPwaFEKfld+CXl1hSeyO3Nr865Jc61nUK46XWuTFOUKGxrzFd62rsxMkxm eQ3Onxsmm5MIwJ91dqMsqTo= Received: (qmail 50941 invoked by alias); 11 Apr 2018 13:52:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 50930 invoked by uid 89); 11 Apr 2018 13:52:53 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=tweaking, HX-BESS-VER:sk:2018.4-, n64, his X-HELO: 9pmail.ess.barracuda.com Received: from 9pmail.ess.barracuda.com (HELO 9pmail.ess.barracuda.com) (64.235.154.211) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 13:52:52 +0000 Received: from mipsdag02.mipstec.com (mail2.mips.com [12.201.5.32]) by mx1403.ess.rzc.cudaops.com (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 11 Apr 2018 13:52:46 +0000 Received: from [10.20.78.219] (10.20.78.219) by mipsdag02.mipstec.com (10.20.40.47) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1415.2; Wed, 11 Apr 2018 06:53:00 -0700 Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 14:51:30 +0100 From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" To: Catherine Moore , Matthew Fortune CC: Paul Hua , Subject: [PATCH 0/2] MIPS/GCC/testsuite: Fixes for data-sym-pool.c Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: mipsdag02.mipstec.com (10.20.40.47) To mipsdag02.mipstec.com (10.20.40.47) X-BESS-ID: 1523454763-321459-4409-737-2 X-BESS-VER: 2018.4-r1804052328 X-BESS-Apparent-Source-IP: 12.201.5.32 X-BESS-Outbound-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-BESS-Outbound-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.191879 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------- 0.00 BSF_BESS_OUTBOUND META: BESS Outbound X-BESS-Outbound-Spam-Status: SCORE=0.00 using account:ESS59374 scores of KILL_LEVEL=7.0 tests=BSF_BESS_OUTBOUND X-BESS-BRTS-Status: 1 Hi, Paul has recently reported a regression test failure with data-sym-pool.c at -O0 in his configuration. After some tweaking I was able to reproduce it with mine. I also realised we need an n64 variant, hence this has become a mini patch series. As these changes are test suite updates only, not affecting code generation in any way and so limited in scope, I propose to have them included in GCC 8 despite it being so close to release. See individual changes for details. Maciej