Message ID | 20240707195341.25305-1-abdul.b.ijaz@intel.com |
---|---|
Headers | show
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-bounces~incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org> X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=Intel header.b=HJUGruel; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=gcc.gnu.org (client-ip=8.43.85.97; helo=server2.sourceware.org; envelope-from=gcc-patches-bounces~incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WHHyc4nGnz1xpP for <incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org>; Mon, 8 Jul 2024 05:54:32 +1000 (AEST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99144385E839 for <incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org>; Sun, 7 Jul 2024 19:54:30 +0000 (GMT) X-Original-To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.9]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE639385B503 for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Sun, 7 Jul 2024 19:54:08 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org BE639385B503 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org BE639385B503 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=198.175.65.9 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1720382051; cv=none; b=ZguCk2bmUhtYOv2Wf1+gKh6VkBzBJ6u6nzQX8NMx6MczQy7WsfA/hMBIa7scSDYD1L8LSm+5g613gnekv9M6Ua/qj8XjV2ryFwzyKCysJ488FbA0xIiOuqr+aE2m9HeSvHQqtVPf0MkmhvBPPeaRQxMqQD4f/IMmfSY0lZ7Kiso= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1720382051; c=relaxed/simple; bh=jU5gJgkSD9RTjyPXFjAPESGOdTzcZDCOmdSNUS9bvYs=; h=DKIM-Signature:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; b=d4gzkA+od2O9ATXdlzr9BWsi2FP0MHMLJBUQeVxXIOFz+PzoK/K7BmsSPxBfHeUaoyDnyJmehvKvg0HzoHv/Qoxs8+vK6zEs7VUL93MjRZcGgffdzsAM/Hk2dm4WkMSHFuvi7fl5s/mMOwWEG9alzgaqMeame2HtJzo7n6SEI94= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1720382049; x=1751918049; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding; bh=jU5gJgkSD9RTjyPXFjAPESGOdTzcZDCOmdSNUS9bvYs=; b=HJUGruelntHm+R1qTEb2XQtY0gZeiA+bBBATON2cc12ZVJ93JahOqdYj 0b2geWyTrDDyvjPjCt+TJkh1btGe6hddISJm4cMgv0yhVmgRRTpZeLwL4 IfVXemCFSagxQHxMbSpqAyKyHhT0F0u5YUMc4It5sctKQoBZllV2gxY/R AJNB+Wg7J+qbix+VPlIo8Cmo8doExi8n164yvWYuT1LpYBuZk1sO52eY4 VmVvNSl3DHFBBXtO7le0RvTHcKmzPNObpvSgX1VkYfbnjh6+9KqbVf/xG Jaomv3E6OAL/7nSlljaGVsgXflfrYZtraxeR1h/gz0PBBDILl3yajblhc g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: RlFUg7f1QOq1bWwySo034Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: z7SgavStSmuKOzLsky3eag== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11126"; a="40088925" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.09,190,1716274800"; d="scan'208";a="40088925" Received: from orviesa003.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.143]) by orvoesa101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Jul 2024 12:54:07 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: x6VlZrdNTTGeAElvK4JlKA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 1mAXddQfTW2ImFo7XyNlVQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.09,190,1716274800"; d="scan'208";a="52133829" Received: from abijaz-mobl2.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.246.42.1]) by ORVIESA003-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Jul 2024 12:54:06 -0700 From: Abdul Basit Ijaz <abdul.b.ijaz@intel.com> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: abdul.b.ijaz@intel.com Subject: [PATCH 0/1] config: Handle dash in library name for AC_LIB_LINKAGEFLAGS_BODY Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2024 21:53:40 +0200 Message-Id: <20240707195341.25305-1-abdul.b.ijaz@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-patches>, <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/> List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-patches>, <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: gcc-patches-bounces~incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org |
Series |
config: Handle dash in library name for AC_LIB_LINKAGEFLAGS_BODY
|
expand
|
From: "Ijaz, Abdul B" <abdul.b.ijaz@intel.com> Hi All, This change fixes the handling of dash(-) in the library names like yaml-cpp for the AC_LIB_LINKAGEFLAGS_BODY script function of the file "config/lib-link.m4" and used by the autoconf tool. This is my first patch for GCC so adding this summary of the change in 0/1 patch and details of the fix can be seen in the patch 1/1. Autoconf 2.69 tool execution only adds few new empty lines and some line numbers are updated in the regenerated configure file after this change. There is no significant change in this file because of this change so have not comitted it. Since this change only affects the libraries having having dash in the name. We need this change eventually for the GDB source code repository which basically gets the copy of these scripts from GCC. Let me know if any testing can be done for this change. Already mentioned I only tried regenerating the configure file and have not notice any significant change so it seems nothing need to be tested. I ran the tests on x86_64 Ubuntu22 setup and there are some unexpeced failures but nothing seems related to this change. Lastly want to mention that I do not have the write access. So I want to ask if this small change can be accepted without CLA. The Signed-off field is already added to the commit to fulfill the DCO. Waiting for your feedback. Thanks & Best Regards Abdul Basit Ijaz, Abdul B (1): config: Handle dash in library name for AC_LIB_LINKAGEFLAGS_BODY config/lib-link.m4 | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)