mbox series

[v1,0/6] dt-bindings: pwm: Cleanup pwm-cells required twice

Message ID cover.1714450308.git.zhoubinbin@loongson.cn
Headers show
Series dt-bindings: pwm: Cleanup pwm-cells required twice | expand

Message

Binbin Zhou April 30, 2024, 7:32 a.m. UTC
Hi all:

When I was submitting the Loongson PWM dt-binding, Rob reminded me that
the pwm-cells property was already required in pwm.yaml and did not need
to be repeated.

This patchset attempts to clean up the required pwm-cells attribute twice.

Thanks.

Binbin Zhou (6):
  dt-bindings: pwm: bcm2835: Do not require pwm-cells twice
  dt-bindings: pwm: google,cros-ec: Do not require pwm-cells twice
  dt-bindings: pwm: marvell,pxa: Do not require pwm-cells twice
  dt-bindings: pwm: mediatek,mt2712: Do not require pwm-cells twice
  dt-bindings: pwm: mediatek,pwm-disp: Do not require pwm-cells twice
  dt-bindings: pwm: snps,dw-apb-timers: Do not require pwm-cells twice

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/google,cros-ec-pwm.yaml    | 1 -
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/marvell,pxa-pwm.yaml       | 1 -
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,mt2712-pwm.yaml   | 1 -
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml     | 1 -
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-bcm2835.yaml           | 1 -
 .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/snps,dw-apb-timers-pwm2.yaml         | 1 -
 6 files changed, 6 deletions(-)

Comments

Conor Dooley April 30, 2024, 4:58 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 03:32:01PM +0800, Binbin Zhou wrote:
> Hi all:
> 
> When I was submitting the Loongson PWM dt-binding, Rob reminded me that
> the pwm-cells property was already required in pwm.yaml and did not need
> to be repeated.
> 
> This patchset attempts to clean up the required pwm-cells attribute twice.

Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>

Cheers,
Conor.
Rob Herring April 30, 2024, 5:16 p.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 2:32 AM Binbin Zhou <zhoubinbin@loongson.cn> wrote:
>
> Hi all:
>
> When I was submitting the Loongson PWM dt-binding, Rob reminded me that
> the pwm-cells property was already required in pwm.yaml and did not need
> to be repeated.
>
> This patchset attempts to clean up the required pwm-cells attribute twice.

Thanks for this.

> Thanks.
>
> Binbin Zhou (6):
>   dt-bindings: pwm: bcm2835: Do not require pwm-cells twice
>   dt-bindings: pwm: google,cros-ec: Do not require pwm-cells twice
>   dt-bindings: pwm: marvell,pxa: Do not require pwm-cells twice
>   dt-bindings: pwm: mediatek,mt2712: Do not require pwm-cells twice
>   dt-bindings: pwm: mediatek,pwm-disp: Do not require pwm-cells twice
>   dt-bindings: pwm: snps,dw-apb-timers: Do not require pwm-cells twice

This could really just be one patch. It's the same repeated change and
it's all going to 1 maintainer. No need to respin for that though.

Rob
Uwe Kleine-König May 1, 2024, 9:58 a.m. UTC | #3
Hello,

On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 03:32:01PM +0800, Binbin Zhou wrote:
> When I was submitting the Loongson PWM dt-binding, Rob reminded me that
> the pwm-cells property was already required in pwm.yaml and did not need
> to be repeated.
> 
> This patchset attempts to clean up the required pwm-cells attribute twice.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Binbin Zhou (6):
>   dt-bindings: pwm: bcm2835: Do not require pwm-cells twice
>   dt-bindings: pwm: google,cros-ec: Do not require pwm-cells twice
>   dt-bindings: pwm: marvell,pxa: Do not require pwm-cells twice
>   dt-bindings: pwm: mediatek,mt2712: Do not require pwm-cells twice
>   dt-bindings: pwm: mediatek,pwm-disp: Do not require pwm-cells twice
>   dt-bindings: pwm: snps,dw-apb-timers: Do not require pwm-cells twice
> 
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/google,cros-ec-pwm.yaml    | 1 -
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/marvell,pxa-pwm.yaml       | 1 -
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,mt2712-pwm.yaml   | 1 -
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml     | 1 -
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-bcm2835.yaml           | 1 -
>  .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/snps,dw-apb-timers-pwm2.yaml         | 1 -
>  6 files changed, 6 deletions(-)

Applied the series to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ukleinek/linux.git pwm/for-next

Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/renesas,tpu-pwm.yaml seems to be
another candidate for a similar cleanup.

Thanks for your cleanup,
Uwe
Binbin Zhou May 7, 2024, 5:32 a.m. UTC | #4
On Wed, May 1, 2024 at 3:58 PM Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 03:32:01PM +0800, Binbin Zhou wrote:
> > When I was submitting the Loongson PWM dt-binding, Rob reminded me that
> > the pwm-cells property was already required in pwm.yaml and did not need
> > to be repeated.
> >
> > This patchset attempts to clean up the required pwm-cells attribute twice.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Binbin Zhou (6):
> >   dt-bindings: pwm: bcm2835: Do not require pwm-cells twice
> >   dt-bindings: pwm: google,cros-ec: Do not require pwm-cells twice
> >   dt-bindings: pwm: marvell,pxa: Do not require pwm-cells twice
> >   dt-bindings: pwm: mediatek,mt2712: Do not require pwm-cells twice
> >   dt-bindings: pwm: mediatek,pwm-disp: Do not require pwm-cells twice
> >   dt-bindings: pwm: snps,dw-apb-timers: Do not require pwm-cells twice
> >
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/google,cros-ec-pwm.yaml    | 1 -
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/marvell,pxa-pwm.yaml       | 1 -
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,mt2712-pwm.yaml   | 1 -
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml     | 1 -
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-bcm2835.yaml           | 1 -
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/snps,dw-apb-timers-pwm2.yaml         | 1 -
> >  6 files changed, 6 deletions(-)
>
> Applied the series to
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ukleinek/linux.git pwm/for-next
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/renesas,tpu-pwm.yaml seems to be
> another candidate for a similar cleanup.

Hi Uwe:

Sorry for the late reply.
Indeed, I missed this file. I'll post another patch later to clean it up.

Thanks.
Binbin
>
> Thanks for your cleanup,
> Uwe
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
> Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |