From d314b0004e9a9d18c30dce4befb7367d6dd8f2bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 04:55:56 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Replace __attribute__((visibility("protected")))
With copy relocation, address of protected data defined in the shared
library may be external. Compiler shouldn't asssume protected data will
be local. But due to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65248
__attribute__((visibility("protected"))) doesn't work correctly, we need
to use asm (".protected xxx") instead.
* elf/ifuncdep2.c (global): Replace
__attribute__((visibility("protected"))) with
asm (".protected global").
* elf/ifuncmod1.c (global): Likewise.
* elf/ifuncmod5.c (global): Likewise.
---
elf/ifuncdep2.c | 8 +++++++-
elf/ifuncmod1.c | 8 +++++++-
elf/ifuncmod5.c | 8 +++++++-
3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
@@ -2,7 +2,13 @@
#include "ifunc-sel.h"
-int global __attribute__ ((visibility ("protected"))) = -1;
+int global = -1;
+/* Can't use __attribute__((visibility("protected"))) until the GCC bug:
+
+ https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65248
+
+ is fixed. */
+asm (".protected global");
static int
one (void)
@@ -6,7 +6,13 @@
*/
#include "ifunc-sel.h"
-int global __attribute__ ((visibility ("protected"))) = -1;
+int global = -1;
+/* Can't use __attribute__((visibility("protected"))) until the GCC bug:
+
+ https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65248
+
+ is fixed. */
+asm (".protected global");
static int
one (void)
@@ -1,7 +1,13 @@
/* Test STT_GNU_IFUNC symbols without direct function call. */
#include "ifunc-sel.h"
-int global __attribute__ ((visibility ("protected"))) = -1;
+int global = -1;
+/* Can't use __attribute__((visibility("protected"))) until the GCC bug:
+
+ https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65248
+
+ is fixed. */
+asm (".protected global");
static int
one (void)
--
1.9.3