diff mbox

[2/2] ARM: at91: sama5d4: dts: change the nand compatible string

Message ID 1421656387-12538-2-git-send-email-josh.wu@atmel.com
State Not Applicable
Headers show

Commit Message

Josh Wu Jan. 19, 2015, 8:33 a.m. UTC
As we introduce a new "atmel,sama5d4-nand" compatible string for sama5d4,
so we need to apply it for sama5d4 chip.

Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com>
---

 arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d4.dtsi | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Brian Norris Jan. 20, 2015, 8:49 p.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 04:33:07PM +0800, Josh Wu wrote:
> As we introduce a new "atmel,sama5d4-nand" compatible string for sama5d4,
> so we need to apply it for sama5d4 chip.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com>
> ---
> 
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d4.dtsi | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d4.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d4.dtsi
> index 1b0f30c..02d67c2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d4.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d4.dtsi
> @@ -267,7 +267,7 @@
>  		};
>  
>  		nand0: nand@80000000 {
> -			compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200-nand";
> +			compatible = "atmel,sama5d4-nand";

Wouldn't it make sense to include both compatible strings, so that old
kernels can still bind to it? The newer IP only adds a new ECC feature,
but the driver still can work fine without handling it, right?

>  			#address-cells = <1>;
>  			#size-cells = <1>;
>  			ranges;

Brian
Josh Wu Jan. 21, 2015, 3:55 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi, Brain

On 1/21/2015 4:49 AM, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 04:33:07PM +0800, Josh Wu wrote:
>> As we introduce a new "atmel,sama5d4-nand" compatible string for sama5d4,
>> so we need to apply it for sama5d4 chip.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com>
>> ---
>>
>>   arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d4.dtsi | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d4.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d4.dtsi
>> index 1b0f30c..02d67c2 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d4.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d4.dtsi
>> @@ -267,7 +267,7 @@
>>   		};
>>   
>>   		nand0: nand@80000000 {
>> -			compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200-nand";
>> +			compatible = "atmel,sama5d4-nand";
> Wouldn't it make sense to include both compatible strings, so that old
> kernels can still bind to it?
yes, that make sense. I'll add it.

> The newer IP only adds a new ECC feature,
> but the driver still can work fine without handling it, right?
so far it works fine without this new feature. But I am not 100% sure 
for this :-)

Best Regards,
Josh Wu

>
>>   			#address-cells = <1>;
>>   			#size-cells = <1>;
>>   			ranges;
> Brian
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d4.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d4.dtsi
index 1b0f30c..02d67c2 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d4.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d4.dtsi
@@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ 
 		};
 
 		nand0: nand@80000000 {
-			compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200-nand";
+			compatible = "atmel,sama5d4-nand";
 			#address-cells = <1>;
 			#size-cells = <1>;
 			ranges;