Message ID | 1421311960-4120-1-git-send-email-yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Hi Yamada-san, Thank you for the patch. On Thursday 15 January 2015 17:52:40 Masahiro Yamada wrote: > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com> Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt | 5 +++-- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt index b9bd1d6..f7a158d > 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt > @@ -69,7 +69,8 @@ GPIO pin number, and GPIO flags as accepted by the > "qe_pio_e" gpio-controller. ---------------------------------- > > A gpio-specifier should contain a flag indicating the GPIO polarity; > active- -high or active-low. If it does, the follow best practices should > be followed: +high or active-low. If it does, the following best practices > should be +followed: > > The gpio-specifier's polarity flag should represent the physical level at > the GPIO controller that achieves (or represents, for inputs) a logically > asserted @@ -147,7 +148,7 @@ contains information structures as follows: > numeric-gpio-range ::= > <pinctrl-phandle> <gpio-base> <pinctrl-base> <count> > named-gpio-range ::= <pinctrl-phandle> <gpio-base> '<0 0>' > - gpio-phandle : phandle to pin controller node. > + pinctrl-phandle : phandle to pin controller node > gpio-base : Base GPIO ID in the GPIO controller > pinctrl-base : Base pinctrl pin ID in the pin controller > count : The number of GPIOs/pins in this range
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 2:52 AM, Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com> wrote: > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com> Perhaps some explanation. You can't just remove properties. Please explain to what extent the old/wrong name is used. This patch is only okay if there are no users of gpio-phandle. Rob > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt | 5 +++-- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt > index b9bd1d6..f7a158d 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt > @@ -69,7 +69,8 @@ GPIO pin number, and GPIO flags as accepted by the "qe_pio_e" gpio-controller. > ---------------------------------- > > A gpio-specifier should contain a flag indicating the GPIO polarity; active- > -high or active-low. If it does, the follow best practices should be followed: > +high or active-low. If it does, the following best practices should be > +followed: > > The gpio-specifier's polarity flag should represent the physical level at the > GPIO controller that achieves (or represents, for inputs) a logically asserted > @@ -147,7 +148,7 @@ contains information structures as follows: > numeric-gpio-range ::= > <pinctrl-phandle> <gpio-base> <pinctrl-base> <count> > named-gpio-range ::= <pinctrl-phandle> <gpio-base> '<0 0>' > - gpio-phandle : phandle to pin controller node. > + pinctrl-phandle : phandle to pin controller node > gpio-base : Base GPIO ID in the GPIO controller > pinctrl-base : Base pinctrl pin ID in the pin controller > count : The number of GPIOs/pins in this range > -- > 1.9.1 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi Rob, On Thursday 15 January 2015 08:07:18 Rob Herring wrote: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 2:52 AM, Masahiro Yamada > > <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com> wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com> > > Perhaps some explanation. You can't just remove properties. Please > explain to what extent the old/wrong name is used. This patch is only > okay if there are no users of gpio-phandle. As far as I understand the patch just fixes a typo. There has never been a gpio-phandle for GPIO controllers, only for GPIO consumers. > > --- > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt | 5 +++-- > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt index b9bd1d6..f7a158d > > 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt > > @@ -69,7 +69,8 @@ GPIO pin number, and GPIO flags as accepted by the > > "qe_pio_e" gpio-controller.> > > ---------------------------------- > > > > A gpio-specifier should contain a flag indicating the GPIO polarity; > > active-> > > -high or active-low. If it does, the follow best practices should be > > followed: +high or active-low. If it does, the following best practices > > should be> > > +followed: > > The gpio-specifier's polarity flag should represent the physical level at > > the GPIO controller that achieves (or represents, for inputs) a > > logically asserted> > > @@ -147,7 +148,7 @@ contains information structures as follows: > > numeric-gpio-range ::= > > > > <pinctrl-phandle> <gpio-base> <pinctrl-base> > > <count> > > > > named-gpio-range ::= <pinctrl-phandle> <gpio-base> '<0 0>' > > > > - gpio-phandle : phandle to pin controller node. > > + pinctrl-phandle : phandle to pin controller node > > > > gpio-base : Base GPIO ID in the GPIO controller > > pinctrl-base : Base pinctrl pin ID in the pin controller > > count : The number of GPIOs/pins in this range
Hi Laurent, Rob, On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 16:10:54 +0200 Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> wrote: > Hi Rob, > > On Thursday 15 January 2015 08:07:18 Rob Herring wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 2:52 AM, Masahiro Yamada > > > > <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com> wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com> > > > > Perhaps some explanation. You can't just remove properties. Please > > explain to what extent the old/wrong name is used. This patch is only > > okay if there are no users of gpio-phandle. > > As far as I understand the patch just fixes a typo. There has never been a > gpio-phandle for GPIO controllers, only for GPIO consumers. Yes, this patch just fixes typos. I thought I could be lazy here... > > > --- > > > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt | 5 +++-- > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt > > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt index b9bd1d6..f7a158d > > > 100644 > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt > > > @@ -69,7 +69,8 @@ GPIO pin number, and GPIO flags as accepted by the > > > "qe_pio_e" gpio-controller.> > > > ---------------------------------- > > > > > > A gpio-specifier should contain a flag indicating the GPIO polarity; > > > active-> > > > -high or active-low. If it does, the follow best practices should be > > > followed: +high or active-low. If it does, the following best practices > > > should be> > > > +followed: > > > The gpio-specifier's polarity flag should represent the physical level at > > > the GPIO controller that achieves (or represents, for inputs) a > > > logically asserted> > > > @@ -147,7 +148,7 @@ contains information structures as follows: > > > numeric-gpio-range ::= > > > > > > <pinctrl-phandle> <gpio-base> <pinctrl-base> > > > <count> > > > > > > named-gpio-range ::= <pinctrl-phandle> <gpio-base> '<0 0>' > > > > > > - gpio-phandle : phandle to pin controller node. > > > + pinctrl-phandle : phandle to pin controller node > > > > > > gpio-base : Base GPIO ID in the GPIO controller > > > pinctrl-base : Base pinctrl pin ID in the pin controller > > > count : The number of GPIOs/pins in this range > > -- > Regards, > > Laurent Pinchart > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com>
Patch applied with Laurent's ACK.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt index b9bd1d6..f7a158d 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt @@ -69,7 +69,8 @@ GPIO pin number, and GPIO flags as accepted by the "qe_pio_e" gpio-controller. ---------------------------------- A gpio-specifier should contain a flag indicating the GPIO polarity; active- -high or active-low. If it does, the follow best practices should be followed: +high or active-low. If it does, the following best practices should be +followed: The gpio-specifier's polarity flag should represent the physical level at the GPIO controller that achieves (or represents, for inputs) a logically asserted @@ -147,7 +148,7 @@ contains information structures as follows: numeric-gpio-range ::= <pinctrl-phandle> <gpio-base> <pinctrl-base> <count> named-gpio-range ::= <pinctrl-phandle> <gpio-base> '<0 0>' - gpio-phandle : phandle to pin controller node. + pinctrl-phandle : phandle to pin controller node gpio-base : Base GPIO ID in the GPIO controller pinctrl-base : Base pinctrl pin ID in the pin controller count : The number of GPIOs/pins in this range
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com> --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)