Message ID | 1400775895-31183-1-git-send-email-nicolas.ferre@atmel.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On Thursday 22 May 2014, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > Another AT91 DT pull-request for 3.16. This one is the conversion of two more > SoC to Common Clock Framework (aka CCF). I identified it as a "DT" pull-request > but it modifies slightly a couple of files in mach-at91 (use of a configuration > option). Four done, four more to go? Nice progress! > This pull-request depends on: > - the fixes that I already sent for 3.15 and that are present in the recent > 3.15-rc6 tag. > - the at91-cleanup tag that you integrated in your arm-soc/next/soc branch. > So, as suggested by Arnd on IRC, I merged both of them to act as the base > before adding the material for this pull-request. > > About the clock nodes that should be grouped in a "clocks" container or not, > while waiting for a clear statement by the DT maintainers, I kept the clocks > nodes as they had been written by Boris. > As proposed by Olof, I plan to send you a comprehensive patch that fixes this > when Mark gives his point of view. Ok. I've merged it into next/dt now. Arnd
On 23/05/2014 at 23:27:51 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote : > On Thursday 22 May 2014, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > > Another AT91 DT pull-request for 3.16. This one is the conversion of two more > > SoC to Common Clock Framework (aka CCF). I identified it as a "DT" pull-request > > but it modifies slightly a couple of files in mach-at91 (use of a configuration > > option). > > Four done, four more to go? Nice progress! > I'm on it ;) I actually have two more almost ready but I will submit the remaining four for 3.17. I don't think this is urgent enough to rush it and I'd like to test it enough before we start removing the old clock implementation and board files.
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> wrote: > On 23/05/2014 at 23:27:51 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote : >> On Thursday 22 May 2014, Nicolas Ferre wrote: >> > Another AT91 DT pull-request for 3.16. This one is the conversion of two more >> > SoC to Common Clock Framework (aka CCF). I identified it as a "DT" pull-request >> > but it modifies slightly a couple of files in mach-at91 (use of a configuration >> > option). >> >> Four done, four more to go? Nice progress! >> > > I'm on it ;) I actually have two more almost ready but I will submit the > remaining four for 3.17. I don't think this is urgent enough to rush it > and I'd like to test it enough before we start removing the old clock > implementation and board files. I think we should spend some more time discussing DTS naming instead! (Just kidding, good progress. Agreed, let it go in when it's ready, it's why we do frequent kernel releases) -Olof